G
Guest
Guest
http://www.emulators.com/pentium4.htm
If Intel is such a good company whats wrong with this infomation ?
If Intel is such a good company whats wrong with this infomation ?
I didn't know Intel sold groceries?? :lol:Intel as allwyse offer good produce
expand the decoder to handle 3 instructions at once. This places a burden on the programmer because instructions now have to be grouped in sets of 3, not just in pairs. Potential 50% speed increase if the code is written properly.
in the AMD Athlon, add additional floating point units to allow up to 3 floating point instructions to execute at once. Big speed win for the Athlon, allowing it to trounce the Intel chips on 3-D and math intensive tasks
any reference for that? I heard that P4 sales were at roughly 1/3 of predicted totals. I don't have a reference for that either though...10 millions of P4 was sold.
Yes, I did, and I meant to say he's biased against P4, not Intel as a whole. I said Intel because the P4/Thunderbird debate is bigger than the Intel/AMD debate, really. It's not who's the better company, but who has the better chip. I should have been clearer.you say he's biased against Intel, but didn't you READ his 25 page essay?
Since you read his 25 pages but not my 25 lines, I HAVE AN AMD PROCESSOR IN MY COMPUTER!!! There, maybe that got through.I can't believe you'd shrug off his essay simply by saying "Oh, he's obviously biased against Intel",
You missed the point. He's pointing out two nearly identical architecural features and not pointing out that AMDs code would have to be optimized. Now, maybe it doesn't have to be, but it's a firm quote showing his SLIGHT bias against the P4. He obviously has his good, thought out reasons, but it was a statement that shouldn't have been made that way. Maybe he didn't mean to, who knows.Regarding your quotation of his remarks about the decoder, you seem to have failed to notice that he explains why this is a burden and how it could have been avoided, as in AMD's solution.
I agree with EVERYTHING HE SAYS! Maybe you should read my post fully before trying to discredit me.Cries of "bias, bias!" are completely misdirected when trying to discredit this guy.