Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > 1.13Ghz Tualatin FASTER THAN 1.13 Athlon!!!

1.13Ghz Tualatin FASTER THAN 1.13 Athlon!!!

Forum CPU & Components : CPUs - 1.13Ghz Tualatin FASTER THAN 1.13 Athlon!!!

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Ask the community Add a reply
Word :    Username :           
 
AmdMELTDOWN   07-09-2001 at 11:22:17 PM

latest benchmark say that Clock for clock a tualatin is faster than a equally clocked 1.13Ghz Athlon.

<A HREF="http://www.watch.impress.co.jp/pc/docs/article/20010709/hotrev117.htm" target="_new">http://www.watch.impress.co.jp/pc/docs/article/20010709/hotrev117.htm</A>

you might need a web traslator:
<A HREF="http://babelfish.altavista.com/" target="_new">http://babelfish.altavista.com/</A>

"AMD/VIA...you <i>still</i> are the weakest link, good bye!"

Add a reply
Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.
noko   07-10-2001 at 12:09:41 AM
- 0 +

Appears that it was not faster in all things, they are pretty much even keel there.

Couldn't read if they used DDR ram or not for the T-Bird. How would the Polimino compare?

How about the 1.4 T-Bird against the 1.4 P4? The T-Bird smoked the P4.

Is the 1.13 P3 cheaper then the 1.4 T-Bird or the 1.4 P4. Also looks like the 1.13 P3 beats the 1.4 P4. What in the hell is Intel doing???

Reply to noko
Grizely1   07-10-2001 at 12:13:30 AM
- 0 +

Old news - this was posted a long time ago.

---------
Grass is a beautiful weed.

Reply to Grizely1
FatBurger   07-10-2001 at 12:22:00 AM
- 0 +

Nice try, but it doesn't say anything about the hardware being used.
Sure a P3 + GeForce 3 would beat a Tbird + Rage 128 in 3Dmark

Anyway, isn't it the P4 that's supposed to rock the house?

------------------------------
My Athlon can beat your Ferrari off the line.

Reply to FatBurger
noko   07-10-2001 at 12:26:00 AM
- 0 +

From the three the P4 looked the worst per same clock speed. Is the P4 really that bad as indicated by those tests??

Reply to noko
dhlucke   07-10-2001 at 06:56:55 AM
- 0 +

Such a shame that the PIII won't be used. Say bye to the Tualitin. They're keeping the Celeron and P4....

<font color=red>Yeah, I took a crap on your lawn. Whatcha gonna do about it?</font color=red>

Reply to dhlucke
Anonymous   07-10-2001 at 07:53:36 AM
- 0 +

I beleive the topic of the post is "tualatin faster than athlon"

Not "why is the tualatin faster than the p4"

Reply to Anonymous
peteb   07-10-2001 at 09:50:07 AM
- 0 +

okay - you lost me there? When did he compare the P4.

I think the gist of his post is the reported intentions of Intel not to release Tualatin as a desktop processor. Still waiting to see if this is true or not.

I think that is quite relevent in a Athlon v.s. Tualatin thread since one of those processors exists and you can buy it mainstream. The other is currently doing engineering rounds and expensive cameos in Tokyo.

-* This Space For Rent *-
email for application details

Reply to peteb
Anonymous   07-10-2001 at 04:18:54 PM
- 0 +

Hahaha! This means the 1.13GHz Tualatin is faster than the 1.3GHz P4!

~ The First Formally Rehabilitated AMD Lemming ~

Reply to Anonymous
FatBurger   07-10-2001 at 04:57:46 PM
- 0 +

noko compared them, that's who he was talking to.

And he's right, the Tualatin is kicking the P4s butt :)

Intel can't even predict which of their own chips is going to be better. Shows how smart they are.

------------------------------
My Athlon can beat your Ferrari off the line.

Reply to FatBurger
peteb   07-10-2001 at 05:04:44 PM
- 0 +

oh - right - thanks for the clarification. I'd mistakenly assumed he might respond to the post he was talking about rather than some other person's post on the bottom of the list!

-* This Space For Rent *-
email for application details

Reply to peteb
dhlucke   07-10-2001 at 08:51:15 PM
- 0 +

WTF?

<font color=red>Yeah, I took a crap on your lawn. Whatcha gonna do about it?</font color=red>

Reply to dhlucke
FatBurger   07-10-2001 at 09:52:13 PM
- 0 +

It's ok dhlucke, it's been solved.

------------------------------
My Athlon can beat your Ferrari off the line.

Reply to FatBurger
AMD_cErTiFiEd   07-11-2001 at 01:10:59 AM
- 0 +

Well maybe it is in some apps... But people gotta realize something that the tbird is 1 year old and the Tualatin isn't even released yet.
Almost like comparing apples to oranges, and 1 year for CPU's is almost a half decade in the big picture compared to other products
Would you ever put a Porsche 911 turbo from 95 against one from today.... no you wont. So lets just wait and see what happens and ignore the tbird and intel benchmarks until the A4 is in mainstream

Reply to AMD_cErTiFiEd
Hades   07-11-2001 at 01:48:55 AM
- 0 +

If the Tualatin is not going to be released as a desktop system, why does ASUS already have a board for it? Maybe this is an indication of the possibility of desktop release.

Reply to Hades
peteb   07-11-2001 at 02:15:32 AM
- 0 +

I have no idea - I'm just passing on the news.

The inquirer reported that Tualation was not going to be released as a desktop cpu - server and mobile only. As you say, this is not consistent with the motherboard manufacturers, but then who knows? Intel seem to be keeping quiet so far.

-* This Space For Rent *-
email for application details

Reply to peteb
Ask the community Add a reply
Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > 1.13Ghz Tualatin FASTER THAN 1.13 Athlon!!!
Go to:

There are 1018 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Forum map
Bestofmedia Forum ©
2000-2009 Bestofmedia Group
Page generated in 0.226 seconds
Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them
How do I win badges?