I've read about LCD screen sizes, resolution, etc. but admittedly, I don't quite get it! Changed from a CRT to a 24" LCD Flat Screen 16:10 with "proper resolution" (according to their table/chart) is to be 1920 X 1200 @ 60 Hz.
Initially I didn't alter any settings & desktop & icons, etc appeared "normal size" - i.e., proportional & readily readable. After a reboot however the taskbar & icons, etc were too tiny. This (apparently) was at 1920 X 1200 res so I changed the res to 1024 X 768 & now it looks about as it did initially - icons, taskbar, webpages, etc are about the right size for someone w/ 20/20 vision!
So,
a.) this seems "backwards" to me (I would've expected the reverse)
&
b.) is 1920 X 1200 just some maximum res? only used if needed for video or photos, etc? (NOT typical everyday internet usage, etc)
Sorry if this is a stupid question & there's something obvious that's just flying over my head!
Initially I didn't alter any settings & desktop & icons, etc appeared "normal size" - i.e., proportional & readily readable. After a reboot however the taskbar & icons, etc were too tiny. This (apparently) was at 1920 X 1200 res so I changed the res to 1024 X 768 & now it looks about as it did initially - icons, taskbar, webpages, etc are about the right size for someone w/ 20/20 vision!
So,
a.) this seems "backwards" to me (I would've expected the reverse)
&
b.) is 1920 X 1200 just some maximum res? only used if needed for video or photos, etc? (NOT typical everyday internet usage, etc)
Sorry if this is a stupid question & there's something obvious that's just flying over my head!