lowest 3dmark scores

heh what is your lowest 3dmark2000\2001 score!? Just for fun we always want the highest numbers which we can get easily but what about the lowest?

3dmark2000: 1684
"1024*768*16
NVIDIA RIVA TNT
AMD Duron(tm) Processor 714MHz"

3Dmark2001: 2663 (add 400 points and thats my high lol)
"1024*768*32
ATI RADEON DDR
AMD Duron(tm) Processor 700MHz"


Have fun!
20 answers Last reply
More about lowest 3dmark scores
  1. I got a 24 with a Diamond Stealth II on a K6/2 400. That was in 2000, it would not run 2001.
    That's right, 0024.

    Video killed my Radio Card!
  2. 3DMark2001: ~1500
    1024x768x32
    Matrox G400 32MB
    AMD Athlon 1000Mhz

    Intel Components, AMD Components... all made in Taiwan!
  3. ok you win.. :)

    Intel Components, AMD Components... all made in Taiwan!
  4. ouch! ok i think we all agree u win lol

    Have fun!
  5. Yes, I posted about it a while back. I think the Stealth II is the absolute worst card that will run it, anything lesser will give you a "won't run" message. But someone could try that card on a slower processor if they would like to try for an even lower score. Just remember that I still have that card and will throw it on P60 if I have to just to beat any challengers. I think I could half that score if I had to, simply be selecting the worst parts that will support the test.
    Funning thing, I think I had to increase my memory to 64MB to get it to run. The system ony had 32MB on my first attempt, which game me a "not enough memory" error.

    Video killed my Radio Card!
  6. Ouch, ouch, poor videocard must have felt like the stupid kid in the ap class at school.

    My lowest was like 2500 in 2000 on a tnt2 ultra.(diamond v770).


    ~Matisaro~
    "Friends don't let friends buy Pentiums"
    ~Tbird1.3@1.55~
  7. HA beat u!

    athlon 1200 @ 1333
    geforce2pro 200/400

    3dmark2001 = 1100
    hehehe
    i too said WTF when i first saw it
    for some strange reason my framerates are a quarter of what they should be if i use the official leadtek win2k detonator drivers (6.6.6)
    wierd.
    :)


    Quote from the Hamster: "Why is it that Morons are just smart enough to understand how to breed?"
  8. 3Dmark2001: 550
    PII-400
    Voodoo3-3000 agp

    <font color=red>Change the sig of the week!</font color=red>
  9. Dual Cel 533 + Savage 4 32mb AGP + 3dmark 2001 = 901 marks

    Nice Intel and AMD users get a Cookie.... :smile: Yummy :smile:
  10. wow even with a dual cellery .. nice got me beat heh

    Have fun!
  11. the p60 runs faster than a p100 for a reason unknown...

    if in doubt blame microsoft...
  12. p3 550... ati rage fury... 92 3dmark 2001... forgot to kill off a cpu hungry app before running it... dont get much better.. wouldnt run on the 266 so i tested the gcard on one of my better boxes (yes 550 is one of my fastest boxes...) which usually runs a g2gts... which gets a bit of a better score... ive had 0 on 3dmark 2000 as in wont run... oh well


    if in doubt blame microsoft...
  13. I know that the Socket4 Pentium (aka P5 core, P60, 66) was completely different than the Socket5 (aka P54 core, P75-200). So if it was more powerfull, I could easily set up a P75 system which would definately be slower than a P100, it uses the 50MHz bus with the same core as the P100.

    Video killed my Radio Card!
  14. then you could pass it to me i have a 486 66 that is still working and also can get to a 486 33

    to bad i took apart my my nice old 4 mhz system it was still working to

    <font color=red>Gasoline + Fire</font color=red><font color=green> Can be a lot of fun</font color=green> :smile: :smile: :smile:
  15. i still have a 386 around as a gaming machine... wiped windows off... just use norton commander... play commander keen... digger and tetris... love it...

    if in doubt blame microsoft...
  16. I don't have a meaningful low score of my own to post but I have a funny side note.

    On the MadOnion Comparison database there is a Geforce 3 paired with an AMD K6-2, 397mhz. Score: 427, 3DMark2001 default benchmark.

    <P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by phsstpok on 08/13/01 07:59 PM.</EM></FONT></P>
  17. I seriously doubt that a 486 meets MadOnion's requirements for their 3DMark 2000 benchmark, and would likely result in a message telling you so. I believe the requirements are 64MB RAM, 16MB Video RAM, and a Pentium class processor.

    Video killed my Radio Card!
  18. AMD K6-2 500
    VIA Apollo and VIA MVP3 chipset
    32mb PC66 Dimm
    32mb EDO Simm
    1.2gb Hd
    500mb Hd
    Voodoo 3 2K (before I realised the bastid was over heating)

    It didn't run it crashed :(

    Although further 'tweaking' pinned this down to the graphics card, one 486 fan, socket 7 fan and a lump of card board (DON'T EVEN ASK!!!)later it was running.

    Best I ever got out of it though was 1024 on 3dmark 2000 (a pc that would score 4000 on 2000 WILL score a lot less on 2001, so if I but this PC on 2001 I'm dreading the score it would give me).

    Oddly enough though it performs fine on games...

    Your nice new PC might be faster then my 286, but my 286 makes a better door stop :smile:
  19. One of my systems just sucks for some reason.

    3D Mark 2001: right around 1400

    That’s with a:
    GeForce 2 MX 400/64MB
    AMD 1.4GHz
    EPOX AMD chipset mobo
    256MB DDR

    I’m no gamer, but what the hell is wrong with this picture?


    - I got a board too: http://www.impactsites2000.com/cgi-bin/ikonboard/ikonboard.cgi
  20. Did you load the <A HREF="http://www.amd.com/products/cpg/bin/" target="_new">AMD drivers</A>?
Ask a new question

Read More

CPUs Duron AMD Processors