Athlon XP 1800 versus 2 1.2 GHz MPs

Anyone seen some benchmarks comparing the two setups? It'd be roughly $300 for two 1.2 GHz Chips, and about $230 for one XP 1800. If I were going to use a machine for Adobe, Macromedia, and other 3d modelling programs would the MP setup be worth the money with the Athlon XP now available?
5 answers Last reply
More about athlon 1800 versus
  1. I'd suggest the XP. Cheaper, less hassle, and ALL programs will use it's full potential.

    U got a problem?! Then dial 1800-328-7448!
  2. i think it would depend on how seriously you're going to be using the programs. for someone who uses them non-profesionaly (not to say you're not good with them...just not for a business), the XP would be the better chip. when you're not using apps that support smp you're just wasting that other cpu. but if you'll be using those progs a lot, the dual sys is probably worth the money.

    besides, niether is going to be very slow anyway.

    no vestige of a beginning, no prospect of an end, when we all disintegrate, it'll all happen again.
  3. Actually, a dualie gives 30-40% increase. Now we calculate that 1.533GHz is nearly 30% faster, and also with better clock for clock performance, the XPis teh BEST choice.

    U got a problem?! Then dial 1800-328-7448!
  4. On SMP maybe in overall XP all the way

    Wisdom dont come with time
    Meilleur chance la prochaine fois
  5. xp better clock for clock performance than mp???
Ask a new question

Read More

CPUs Macromedia Windows XP