P4 20 vs 1800+

juin

Distinguished
May 19, 2001
3,323
0
20,780
To make a good combat i jave clear any benchmark with win 98se.we all know that 98 dont made a good mix with L2 cache of P4.PAL also work better with.the same goes for Sysmark 2k and 3dmark 2k.


Sysmark 2001

P4 i850 195
PAL 1800 (kt266a) 184
So a good 11 point for P4.

quake who start to be old.Still quake is the most important benchmark for many.(if you want me answer Dronez is way more important)

P4 i850 253FPS
pal 1800 kt266a 238FPS

P4 win be 15 FPS.

Quake n15

P4 55.4
Pal 57

Pal win be 1.6 FPS like i have say before PAL performe well with quake now that he have sse.

UT The only game that have athlon optimize.

P4 51.8
PAl 55.8

Pal win be 4 FPS.

3Dmark 2001

PAL 7285
P4 7104

a 180 point advance for PAL.


Cinema 4D

P4 19.99
PAL 21.34


Sisoft sandra who care i just use it when i O*C a comp. good way to see what the O*C have done.

Total Sysmark P4 is 5% faster Quake is 4% ( i dont have take n15 demo) Unreal is 8% faster on PAL /dmark is 1.5% faster on PAL Cinema 4D is 6 % faster on PAL.


Overall Athlon win be something like 3% or 4%.Maybe when asus tek will release there own via kt266a will add a 1% on athlon score same goes for driver/bios.In 2 week 5% to 6% that P4 2.0GHZ.Does 6% is make any difference for Pc1066 and northwood.Just pc 1066 add more power that 6 around 10% to 14%.AMD have 1 month (around) before the release of northwood.



Kelledin do you need a link to prove that i850 is more stable that any athlon chipset.I think tom was clear.I850 is more stable and more useur frindely.

Wisdom dont come with time
Meilleur chance la prochaine fois
 

kusek

Distinguished
Jul 15, 2001
246
0
18,680
whoa hoss. check out the sysmark 2001 error that doesn't turn on SSE for the XP or MP processors. Actually, Microsoft Windows Media Encoder is to blame but check out the results when SSE is enabled.
XP 1800 = 198
P4 2.0 = 191
thats 7 points for XP
<A HREF="http://www.anandtech.com/cpu/showdoc.html?i=1543&p=8" target="_new">Sysmark 2001 results</A>
<A HREF="http://www.anandtech.com/cpu/showdoc.html?i=1543&p=5" target="_new">Sysmark error</A>
Quake 3 scores are quite different too.
P4 2.0 = 242.1
XP 1800 = 237.8
that 4.3 points for P4
<A HREF="http://www.anandtech.com/cpu/showdoc.html?i=1543&p=10" target="_new">Quake 3 Arena</A>
Now based to your earlier measurements
Sysmark XP is 3.7% faster not 5% slower than P4 -- 8.7% off
Quake 3 is 1.8% slower not 4% slower than P4 -- 2.2% off
Well, I don't know how you got 3-4% but I would say you were off by 10.9% on those two tests anyway. But the XP is NOT 13.9-14.9% faster than a P4, probably somewhere in between those two extremes.
Well see what the Northwood is when it comes out. To talk about it know would only be guessing. My guess is it will be slightly faster.