According to both Monarch Computers and Athlonxp.com, the XP1900+ is now shipping in limited quantities to vendors in preparation for the official release announcement sometime next week (probably the same time AMD and nVidia officially release nForce with board availability.
XP1900+ should perform roughly equivalent to between a 2.1ghzP4 and 2.2ghz P4. This is scheduled to be the last speed increase for Athlon until next year.
Should be interesting!
Mark-
When all else fails, throw your computer out the window!!!
AMD announced it will include a freon cooling unit with the retail Athlon XP 1900+.
Seriously, it should be interesting to see how much the heat increase is from model to model. Has anyone ever seen a review that showed heat progression of each CPU?
60 FPS, 70 FPS, 80 FPS Crash!
Daylight comes and I have to go to work
Well, Athlon is about the same temp in the core as P4 unless overclocked, so I wouldn't be overly concerned. XP1900 is likely about 10% cooler than Athlon T-bird 1.4.
Mark-
When all else fails, throw your computer out the window!!!
Well, Athlon is about the same temp in the core as P4 unless overclocked
LOL any P4 run 5 to 10 celcius lower that any PAL or t-bird it been alwayse like that.Me P4 1.7 run at 46 celcius with retail fan (3200) and retail HSF and no case fan (not for long).
Wisdom dont come with time
Meilleur chance la prochaine fois
LOL any P4 run 5 to 10 celcius lower that any PAL or t-bird it been alwayse like that.
Until you <b>actually</b> run AMD's, you shouldn't have made any <b><font color=red>false</b></font color=red> comment like this. My KG7-RAID with TB1000@1333MHz is running cooler than your P4(~42C, at full load ~48C)!
BTW, I'm using Volcano 5 that costed me 10 bucks!
Good or Bad have no meaning at all, depends on what your point of view is.<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by khha4113 on 11/02/01 04:26 PM.</EM></FONT></P>
Hmmm...why don't we ask that question in <A HREF="http://www.hardforum.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=246848" target="_new">HardOCP's Intel heartland</A>, where every comment is bound to be in favor of Intel...
I especially love quotes like this:
Quote :
1.5 GHz P4 @1982 is 38c idle and 58c load. that's with the regular heatsink and arctic silver 2
58C? My T-bird never goes over 51C. The fastest Athlon (the XP 1800) runs even cooler while outperforming any P4 currently in production.
Quote :
I have a 1.7 Ghz P4 and Abit TH7-II at 1938 Mhz now (1.9 V set in the BIOS), and the hardware monitor shows about 42 C idle. Goes up to about 57 under load.
Oh, only at 1.7GHz? My T-bird runs cooler and faster than that...
Quote :
With 1.75V, mine runs about 33C idle, all the way up to near 60C during full load. And, I *know* I've got good cooling for my case.
Aww, another P4 "success story!" Be glad it has thermal protection, cos it needs that protection more than any T-bird in existence.
Quote :
wow, from the looks of that chart, Intel procs past 1.7 ghz-ish run hotter than the Thuderbirds (1.4 ghz).
The truth is revealed! RoFL LOL
Kelledin
<A HREF="http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/" target="_new">LFS</A>: "You don't eat or sleep or mow the lawn; you just hack your distro all day long."
P.S. Yes, this was a low blow, but I despise someone who spouts unresearched/false opinions as if they were hard facts. This smackdown is brought to you by Kelledin and his eternal disdain for hatchet burial.
He said he was running a Volcano 5. It is very possible. Without any overclocking (CPU and graphics), my temps are in the 30s but I'm using 2 cases a 2-fan Enermax Whisper, and a GlobalWin WBK-38.
AMD technology + Intel technology = Intel/AMD Pentathlon IV; the <b>ULTIMATE</b> PC processor
So what is the real performance of that 2ghz P4 Juin?
Oh!! similar to 1.5ghz P3? or 1.4ghz Athlon
hmmm... 2ghz doesn't sound like such a deal now and 1.6ghz (XP1900+) is looking better all the time in comparison.
My poiunt.. don't be trolling silly questions like that Juin. It demeans you.
Mark-
When all else fails, throw your computer out the window!!!
Not much though. Some people are speculating that the P4 would get better cooling <i>without</i> the heat spreader. All I know is that even <i>with</i> the heat spreader, the P4s are generally reported to run hotter than equivalent Athlons.
Kelledin
<A HREF="http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/" target="_new">LFS</A>: "You don't eat or sleep or mow the lawn; you just hack your distro all day long."
hey brent...
the XP 1800+ puts out a max of 66W of energy, same as the athlon 1200C, well below the 72W for the athlon 1.4. so the 1900+ is still well below the athlon 1.4... and amd could proly get another 2 speed grades out of it before thermal output exceeds the athlon 1.4
i did a another thread on it today, in the CPU room
Is that a Northwoody in your pocket or are you just eXPited to see me?
doing the math... from the electrical specification table: (full load wattages used)
athie 1.4 = 72W
xp 1500+ = 60W
xp 1600+ = 62.8W
xp 1700+ = 64W
xp 1800+ = 66W
therefore:
xp 1900+ ~ 68W
xp 2000+ ~ 70W
xp 2100+ ~ 72W
course these are approximations... dont think the relationship is quite linear, think its a bit exponential.
Is that a Northwoody in your pocket or are you just eXPited to see me?
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.