Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

P4 FSB 533 Q2 2002

Last response: in CPUs
Share
Anonymous
a b à CPUs
November 9, 2001 9:07:42 PM

http://www.theinquirer.org/09110115.htm


We have loss tullosh but not Pc1066.

The price range are very weird but who care the RDRAM solution will cost way less.

More about : fsb 533 2002

November 9, 2001 9:15:23 PM

That me again.

Wisdom dont come with time
Meilleur chance la prochaine fois
November 9, 2001 9:42:01 PM

Good, right when the thoroughbred is released, it will be an interesting year for cpus.

~Matisaro~
"The Cash Left In My Pocket,The BEST Benchmark"
~Tbird1.3@1.5~
Related resources
November 9, 2001 10:51:18 PM

If you look at AMD roadmap toroughbred will be releasing in Q2 so maybe intel want for sure extra bullet for Q2.I still wait for better FSB from AMD. the are wait for that intel get to 100GB/sec before moving.Even if they got high FPU performance,photoshop FPU intensif are also bandwith intensif.They will be tecnical KO if there are not releasing FSB at lease at 333.

Wisdom dont come with time
Meilleur chance la prochaine fois
November 10, 2001 1:37:04 AM

AMD chips use their bandwidth more efficiently, they will increase bandwidth in time, but they run fine at 266 to do well against the p4.

~Matisaro~
"The Cash Left In My Pocket,The BEST Benchmark"
~Tbird1.3@1.5~
November 10, 2001 1:41:09 AM

Strangely me sisoft sandra dont speak the same language.

Have you some link or tecnical info.I be happy to learn something new.

Wisdom dont come with time
Meilleur chance la prochaine fois
November 10, 2001 1:43:26 AM

I was thinking that is the memory controler how was making the """efficency "" of RAM.

Wisdom dont come with time
Meilleur chance la prochaine fois
November 10, 2001 1:50:14 AM

What I meant was the bandwith is not AMD's limiting factor, and that while they will do well to increase the fsb of their chips in time, it will not mean they will lose if they do not when the p4 does.

~Matisaro~
"The Cash Left In My Pocket,The BEST Benchmark"
~Tbird1.3@1.5~
November 10, 2001 2:03:18 AM

What I meant was the bandwith is not AMD's limiting factor, and that while they will do well to increase the fsb of their chips in time, it will not mean they will lose if they do not when the p4 does.

Mose of the website say DDR for P4 work well.P4 dont need this much bandwith.On a P4 2.0 DDR score 5% less and Pc 1066 improve be 10% maybe not bottleneck but that dont hurt.



Wisdom dont come with time
Meilleur chance la prochaine fois
November 10, 2001 2:11:36 AM

It would be good, but its not needed to win, which is all I am saying.

~Matisaro~
"The Cash Left In My Pocket,The BEST Benchmark"
~Tbird1.3@1.5~
November 10, 2001 3:15:09 AM

It would be good, but its not needed to win, which is all I am saying.


right now every little 1% that you can add to your score worth a lot

Wisdom dont come with time
Meilleur chance la prochaine fois
!