athlon1500+ is shown as 1333.
Tags:
Last response: in CPUs
New Athlon 1500+ is shown as 1333. I have a new Athlon 1500+ chip on a K7S5A mainboard. The machine runs fine but only scores 5011 on the madonion 2000 tester used by Tom's hardware, and I would be expecting 6000+. Also the CPU is shown as a 1333 at startup. Is there anything I can do to correct this (already tried advanced setup etc), thanks in anticipation.
More about : athlon1500 shown 1333
your system is showing the right thing.
AMD AthlonXP model 1500+ actually runs at 1333 MHz, and gives a P4 relative performance of 1500 or even more!
Read this <A HREF="http://athlonxp.amd.com/technicalInformation/benchmarki..." target="_new">doc</A> to get the overall idea of model numbering.
girish
<font color=red>No system is fool-proof. Fools are Ingenious!</font color=red>
AMD AthlonXP model 1500+ actually runs at 1333 MHz, and gives a P4 relative performance of 1500 or even more!
Read this <A HREF="http://athlonxp.amd.com/technicalInformation/benchmarki..." target="_new">doc</A> to get the overall idea of model numbering.
girish
<font color=red>No system is fool-proof. Fools are Ingenious!</font color=red>
Related ressources
- 1333 MHz DDR3 shown as 1066MHz in bios - Forum
- Memory 1066Mhz shown instead of 1333 Mhz on HP PC - Forum
- 667Mhz shown instead of 1333 Mhz!? - Forum
- Full Memory Not Shown - Forum
- Different FSB DRAM ratios shown in cpu-z and aida64 - Forum
UltraTurk - What are you on about - Do we all have to choose if you are a moron or a troll. Well since there's no known trolls in the thread yet and your the only moron here I opt for moron :smile:
Anyway - we came accross a similar problem where I work - we were selling processors (can't remeber speed) but they were showing up as slower. We were told to tell our customers that it is because the chip came out way after the BIOS so it didn't recognise the cpu thus displaying a smaller number - It still runs at the clock speed it was sold at though. Is this BS or could there be some truth in that? I must admit I was a bit wary who I told that to.
You are responsible for any damage the info in your post may cause to my system.
Anyway - we came accross a similar problem where I work - we were selling processors (can't remeber speed) but they were showing up as slower. We were told to tell our customers that it is because the chip came out way after the BIOS so it didn't recognise the cpu thus displaying a smaller number - It still runs at the clock speed it was sold at though. Is this BS or could there be some truth in that? I must admit I was a bit wary who I told that to.
You are responsible for any damage the info in your post may cause to my system.
If a bios can't display the speed of the chip correctly, then either the chip speed is not set up correctly, or the chip isn't the chip it's suposed to be.
There are other tools to check out the CPU speed, and perhaps that realy was the situation with your MB, but I've never heard of that.
Chesnuts roasting on an open CPU
Bill Gates nipping at your wallet
There are other tools to check out the CPU speed, and perhaps that realy was the situation with your MB, but I've never heard of that.
Chesnuts roasting on an open CPU
Bill Gates nipping at your wallet
there's nothing to correct. if you noticed...your cpu is called the athlon 1500+. the 1500 is a "model number", not the actual cpu speed. anyways...this is amd's flashy new nameing system thing (in my opinion, this name game thing is almost as qurky as win me).
I don't claim to know anything about everything, I just tell people what I know.
-PSB
I don't claim to know anything about everything, I just tell people what I know.
-PSB
Depending on your system, since it reports a 1333 with your XP1500+ it is likely your motherboard bios image (software) does not fully support Athlon XP.
A compliant XP supporting bios should read Athlon XP1500+ on boot. This means that some of the goodies built into the XP (like full SSE) may not be enabled as your motherboard doesn't know they are there.
See if there is a newer bios version for your board available that supports XPs...
Other than that it is most likely your videocard or other components limiting your 3dmark score. Post your full system component list (vid card, motherboard, memory etc.) and we'll take a look!
-* <font color=red> Under Offer </font color=red> *-
email for application details
A compliant XP supporting bios should read Athlon XP1500+ on boot. This means that some of the goodies built into the XP (like full SSE) may not be enabled as your motherboard doesn't know they are there.
See if there is a newer bios version for your board available that supports XPs...
Other than that it is most likely your videocard or other components limiting your 3dmark score. Post your full system component list (vid card, motherboard, memory etc.) and we'll take a look!
-* <font color=red> Under Offer </font color=red> *-
email for application details
Quote:
Anyway - we came accross a similar problem where I work - we were selling processors (can't remeber speed) but they were showing up as slower. We were told to tell our customers that it is because the chip came out way after the BIOS so it didn't recognise the cpu thus displaying a smaller number - It still runs at the clock speed it was sold at though. Is this BS or could there be some truth in that? I must admit I was a bit wary who I told that to.It's true I seen it happen before, back in the socket 7 days. some of the older bioses would only show the highest clock speed they were programmed with, although the chip/system was actually running at a higher speed then the bios would post. Verified thru several benchmarks and wcpuid. Happens alot when you take an old s7 and stick in a k6-2/3 and use a 2x multipier ( which the k6 sees as a 6x multiplier). This would give you 66.6 x 6 = 400 mhz, however the bios of the board might only know 300 max. Still the chip was running at 400 mhz.
Another Cookie? Who is going to pay my dentist bill?
ill tell ya what DIDNT have content today!
it was the compac bog standard harvey norman pc's they sell to newbies...
p4 1.4's & 1.5 with tnt2 & 256mb sdram...
celleron 1.1's with 128mb sdram and integrated graphics!
even duron 1.0's with the classic tnt2 M64!
woo damn hoo!
and they still costed a bucketload of cash yesh
Why do i feel like the lone sane voice in the mental assylum?
it was the compac bog standard harvey norman pc's they sell to newbies...
p4 1.4's & 1.5 with tnt2 & 256mb sdram...
celleron 1.1's with 128mb sdram and integrated graphics!
even duron 1.0's with the classic tnt2 M64!
woo damn hoo!
and they still costed a bucketload of cash yesh
Why do i feel like the lone sane voice in the mental assylum?
I was at Harvey's the other day and could not believe that people would actually fork out that much for so called "High end systems" as they call em, rofl. Its not just them, plenty of big electrical appliance places are the same.
Makes me feel happy with what I have spent on the cash deposit box err', I mean machine under my desk!
I felt like telling people they were being ripped off, but I reckon if a fool wants to offload their cash let them coz they wont listen anyway. They will be back complaining within 6 months after they have worked out why it has crappy sound and graphics, and having trouble with newer hardware due to elcheapo MB's. And thoroughly p1ssed off with customer service.
But hey "it cost alot and they said it was a P4 /or Athlon so its has to be good."
<font color=orange>Beam</font color=orange><font color=red> me</font color=red><font color=green> up</font color=green><font color=blue> Scotty</font color=blue> :wink:
Makes me feel happy with what I have spent on the cash deposit box err', I mean machine under my desk!
I felt like telling people they were being ripped off, but I reckon if a fool wants to offload their cash let them coz they wont listen anyway. They will be back complaining within 6 months after they have worked out why it has crappy sound and graphics, and having trouble with newer hardware due to elcheapo MB's. And thoroughly p1ssed off with customer service.
But hey "it cost alot and they said it was a P4 /or Athlon so its has to be good."
<font color=orange>Beam</font color=orange><font color=red> me</font color=red><font color=green> up</font color=green><font color=blue> Scotty</font color=blue> :wink:
Related ressources:
- Forum1600 Mhz RAM shows up as 1333 Khz in bios.
- ForumOCing 1333 RAM to 1600? Text-Heavy Post!
- Forum4gb is shown as 3.24 gb usable
- ForumFull Memory not shown
- ForumBest Timings Settings for G.Skill Ripjaws 1333 mhz
- ForumDDR3 1600 shows as 1333 in BIOS - New Build Ever
- Forum5830 Lagging in particular games? Data not shown up correctly.
- Forum1600 running at 1333
- Forum1866 memory clocked at 1333 on sabertooth 990x
- ForumDifference between mobos with "OC" shown vs. not for its RAM specs
- Forum6300 fx vishera black edition
- ForumP4 vs. Athlon 1333... vs PIII?
- ForumIs a ABIT KT7A-RAID Mboard compatable W/ Tbird 1333?
- More resources
!