Archived from groups: alt.sys.pc-clone.dell (
More info?)
"Tom Scales" <tomtoo@softhome.net> wrote in message
news:jr6dnd3QMMZfiMfcRVn-jg@comcast.com...
> There's no overhead in breaking the stream up into two pieces and
> determining which drive to send which pieces?
That was not the issue cretin. You said RAID 0 couldn't stream at 2X speed.
You are WRONG. RAID 0 does stream at 2X speed and it does take a small
amount of extra processing to keep that stream flowing at 2X speed. For
software/firmware RAID like that on current mobos and low end Promise cards
that processing is done by the host x86 CPU. For hardware RAID that
processing is done by an onboard uP like on cards from www.3ware.com.
Either way they stream RAID 0 for two drives at 2X speed.
Get a clue. You are out of your depth.
> Tee hee.
>
> Idiot
> "Ron Reaugh" <rondashreaugh@att.net> wrote in message
> news:48o6d.644300$Gx4.37829@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> >
> > "Tom Scales" <tomtoo@softhome.net> wrote in message
> > news:MY-dnUg2nqXslcfcRVn-tw@comcast.com...
> >> No it is not EXACTLY twice. There's overhead associated with striping,
> >> so
> >> it is clearly less than 100%.
> >
> > WRONG, not for streaming like big file/video I/O. It's exactly twice.
> > It's
> > physics.
> > Two drives have the same number of user sectors per track and both are
> > spinning at the same RPM. Both are delivering data at that speed gives
> > 2X.
> > There is no place for anykind of overhead.
> >
> >> You speak with authority.
> >>
> >> But seem to be frequently wrong.
> >
> > Usually right you mean. It's just that you frequently need correction.
> >
> >> "Ron Reaugh" <rondashreaugh@att.net> wrote in message
> >> news:adn6d.450541$OB3.24522@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> >> >
> >> > "Timothy Daniels" <TDaniels@NoSpamDot.com> wrote in message
> >> > news:uKudnUJTwf1yacTcRVn-vQ@comcast.com...
> >> >> "schnoopy" wrote:
> >> >> > Striping is two drives acting as one drive.
> >> >> > Two 120GB drives will give you 240GB of
> >> >> > useable space. Your files (pieces of files)
> >> >> > will be spread between the two drives.
> >> >> > Lose one drive and you've lost everything.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> And the advantage, of course, is that data
> >> >> that is striped across 2 drives can be put on
> >> >> the IDE channel faster than one drive could do
> >> >> it. The actual speedup depends on lots of
> >> >> variables, but it's nowhere close to double the
> >> >> speed of one drive.
> >> >
> >> > No, it is exactly twice the speed of a single drive for large
> > contiguous
> >> > data transfers.
> >> >
> >> >> This RAID technique, known
> >> >> as RAID Level 0, is used a lot by gamers to
> >> >> speed up their HD accesses.
> >> >
> >> > Not really.
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>