AMD multiplier & FSB

If you can get DDR memory to handle that FSB of 166mhz/332mhz please tell me how?

Basically its a balance of multiplier and FSB overclocking that works best for me, it depends on what hardware you have installed, some say to go fsb as high as you can go-back off until stable then up the multiplier and Vcore and find a stable level. I personally prefer to go multiplier first then fsb, as the multiplier directly effects the CPU where FSB effects the hardware and busses and could do as I did and blow a HDD and hurt a PCI bus card..(they were crap anyway)


<font color=orange>Beam</font color=orange><font color=red> me</font color=red><font color=green> up</font color=green><font color=blue> Scotty</font color=blue>

I agonised over that same decision you made to stay with that technology, I was in a simular situation and went DDR instead. Cant o'clock it as much but whatever.

Are you sure about having better performance than a 1.4? or you were talking default?

Well well, a challenge to you my friend, you and your 1.2 overclocked max- and my 1.4 overclocked x multiplier and I will stay at 133fsb on si-soft Sandra or any bench...ok? That’s fair yeah? (I have a crappy hdd but say no way that a 1.2 can even get near a 2Ghz P4, oh ooops did I say that! I mean a 1.4Ghz maxed and stable@1680Mhz is that the same thing!)
Btw I do get 13 x on my cpu/board for about an hour, but my favourite is 11.5x.

Don't ya hate being quoted...?

Go get em !!!



<font color=orange>Beam</font color=orange><font color=red> me</font color=red><font color=green> up</font color=green><font color=blue> Scotty</font color=blue>

The new XP333 looks ideal for that, having 1/5 and 1/6 PCI dividers. You'll want to find some PC2700 for it though.

What's the frequency, Kenneth?