Actually, on my Alpha, the fan is on one side, and the place where air is allowed to come in is on the opposite side. It's not on the top of the heat sink.
[good guess]
Point I was trying to make is:
Heatsinks Without a Schroud - They usually have (I believe) a lower profile fins and have a fan mounted directly on top blowing down. It's more efficient for the fan to blow air in as the frontal wake produced by the fan is large enough to get at all the contact area. If the fan was drawing air from the heatsink in this model, there will be air current leaks which don't contribute to the cooling. Making a schroud for the purpose of drawing air out for traditional heatsinks may be difficult: 1) profile is lower to begin with, 2) the heat sink contact area blocks the opening on the opposite side requiring air to enter in a small gap from all side. A relatively static volume of air may be created near the center of the heat sink assembly if this idea was attemped.
Heatsinks With Schrouds (Alpha) - They tend have a square side profile because the fan needs to be mounted on the side to draw air through the fins. The exhaust part of the fan tends to creates eddys, the intake part of the fan tends to create linear flow. So the air is drawn out for maximum cooling effeciency.
Order of effectiveness for Alpha type heatsinks:
1) Cubical heatsink, fan on the side, with schroud, drawing air through the fins (linear flow for maximum cooling efficiency).
2) Cubical heatsink, fan on the side, with schroud, blowing air through the fins (outflow wake tends to produce eddys reducing cooling efficiency).
Order of effectiveness for traditional type heatsinks:
1) Low profile heatsink, fan on top, no schroud, blowing air through the fins (outflow wake is turbulent enough to get at the surface area of the heat sink).
2) Low profile heatsink, fan on top, no schroud, drawing air through the fins (air current leaks will not contribute to the cooling efficiency).
[/good guess]
Sorry for being so verbose. This is an interesting topic.