I keep reading how the amd xp processor is built to get the most out of systems running win xp ... so ... if I am running win 2000, how much difference will it make using an amd mp processor vs. an amd xp processor??
They both will do equally well. The XP has nothing to do with operating systems. The difference between Athlon XP and Athlon MP is that MP has been certified to run on a motherboard that supports multi-processors.
<font color=blue>Will Rogers never liked me.</font color=blue>
What about performance? Does it do even more work per clock like the XP already has or is it just that it supports multiple Processors? Btw, its pricing is extremly well put, just a few bucks higher than its counterpart..