Well like Raystonn said, the top of the line is always expensive!
It is hard to find a good price, and the AXP 1900 is 423$ CDN here, which is bad IMO, especially it's 1.6GHZ at that cost though, against a 1.6GHZ P4 which is only 300$ CDN, I guess the PR does the change here!
Still, each time a new chip comes out, the top one goes lower priced, and then comes the always welcome price drops! So basically we still get better bang of the buck by AMD so far. To me, even if the economy comes back to normal, screw that I mean it's 600$ damn US bucks!! You think we as computer experts are actually that stupid to pay for something that we can get for 3 times less and better performance? Lol, Intel, lol. There were times those guys shined, but now they lost my eye on their glow.
I wish one day they will finally catch up in speed, continuing on par, so no more confusions about PRICE, and PERFORMANCE. If the AXP at 2.5GHZ is better than the NW 2.5GHZ, and it is 20% less costly, then you do the math. But we'll have to agree though, if we take off the PR rating, and use raw MHZ with AMD, they would stand to lose a lot of average consumers. Since the 1.6GHZ costs a tad less than a 1.9GHZ P4, and Joes see the PR 1900 as 1.9GHZ, that can make a huge loss for AMD here. So basically the Tbred might help remove the PR and use raw MHZ back to comparing.
Right now the problem is that they aren't going in 100MHZ increments, resulting in a loss of value per increased XP rating! The more the PR raises, the lower the alternative in MHZ, and the lower the value the PR gives compared to a Tbird. Do you get what I am saying? I did a thread once on it, that because of the bad incremental value, an XP 1900 is NOT the performance of a 1.9GHZ Tbird sadly. In recent benchmarks the 1900 is outperforming the P4 2GHZ quite well, but not in a margin that the Tbird would have done at 1.9GHZ. I recall the Tbird 1.4GHZ's max best performance before it was beaten, was 400MHZ. So basically a 1.8GHZ and higher is needed to beat it. Now the Tbird 1.9GHZ should be better than P4 2.3GHZ right? But the AXP proves it wrong! I hope they rectify that.
--
The other day I heard an explosion from the other side of town.... It was a 486 booting up...<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by Eden on 12/29/01 03:24 PM.</EM></FONT></P>