from all reports im reading, thouroughbred WONT have official 166(333)fsb support
why are they doing this???
333fsb is easily achievable at the moment (abeit with the right overclocking/chipset/PCI dividers), and a new host of motherboards are comming out soon that support DDR333. unfortunately it seems, spec's for the new chipsets say they still only officially support 200/266fsb, thus the extra bandwidth of PC2700 would essentially be wasted in a asynchronous setup
sure one could overclock, but its getting harder to do that from the days of athlon and the "pencil trick", and it would be alot better to have official support
why???
AMD could easily have lots more performance for essentailly no cost.
The lack of thermal protection on Athlon's is cunning way to stop morons from using AMD.
why are they doing this???
333fsb is easily achievable at the moment (abeit with the right overclocking/chipset/PCI dividers), and a new host of motherboards are comming out soon that support DDR333. unfortunately it seems, spec's for the new chipsets say they still only officially support 200/266fsb, thus the extra bandwidth of PC2700 would essentially be wasted in a asynchronous setup
sure one could overclock, but its getting harder to do that from the days of athlon and the "pencil trick", and it would be alot better to have official support
why???
AMD could easily have lots more performance for essentailly no cost.
The lack of thermal protection on Athlon's is cunning way to stop morons from using AMD.