P4 1.6M 512 Cache

G

Guest

Guest
I have seen the P4 1.6M with 512kb of cache but the 1.7 thru 1.9 are only offered with 256, anybody know why?
 

khha4113

Distinguished
Dec 31, 2007
2,143
0
19,780
I have seen the P4 1.6M with 512kb of cache but the 1.7 thru 1.9 are only offered with 256, anybody know why?
They have <b><A HREF="http://www.pricewatch.com/1/3/4392-5.htm" target="_new"><font color=blue>1.8 P4 512K L2</A></b></font color=blue> too. There are 2 vendors that offer it, <b><A HREF="http://mate.pricewatch.com/scripts/b.asp?3053478" target="_new">Spartan</A></b> and <b><A HREF="http://www.microx-press.com/templates/micro/product.asp?sid=3CFEC5E1A34645AC8073789EF78181C2&prodid=CPUIN753A" target="_new">MicroExpress</A></b>.

:smile: Good or Bad have no meaning at all, depends on what your point of view is.
 

pr497

Distinguished
Oct 21, 2001
1,343
0
19,280
i might actually buy the 1.8 northwood at one of those places. i was planning on getting the 2 ghz northwood cuz i couldnt find the 1.8.


:mad: <A HREF="http://gamershq.madonion.com/compare2k1.shtml?2096468" target="_new">P4 + SDRAM</A> = <b>BAD</b> :mad:
 

dhlucke

Polypheme
<A HREF="http://www.resellerratings.com/cgi-bin/reseller/vendone.cgi?Spartantechonlogies" target="_new">Out of 101 reviews, a 4.9 rating</A>

<A HREF="http://www.resellerratings.com/cgi-bin/reseller/vendone.cgi?MicroX-Press" target="_new">Out of 16 reviews, a 4.1 rating</A>

I still think we need better vendors. I wouldn't spend my money at any place with a poor rating.

<font color=red>God</font color=red> <font color=blue>Bless</font color=blue> <font color=red>America!</font color=red>
 
G

Guest

Guest
save your cash, go for 1.8 and get a good cooler you'll be set and richer!
 

mala

Distinguished
Oct 12, 2001
45
0
18,530
I have seen the P4 1.6M with 512kb of cache but the 1.7 thru 1.9 are only offered with 256, anybody know why?
Northwood only comes in 200MHz increments (thank god).

Back in the days of the 80486, frequencies jumped from 25MHz to 33MHz in one brave step. There were no 19MHz to 20MHz or PR19@16000kHz to PR20@16667kHz increments, and noone considered an overclock of a 80386-16@17.3MHz something to write home about. Of course, back in the days Intel couldn't release a new speed grade every two months...

What do I want to say with this?
Nothing, really.