What the hell people? No one agreed with me that the P4's performance was bad until this article, I tried to tell people that it did horrible for how much faster it was (mhz) butt none of my AMD buddies where there. What happend? Now it looks like everyone is agreeing that the P4 did very poor.
But this is PERFECT!!! I'm not sure if some of you remember but I started this whole thing about the p4 with my original P4 SUCKY!!! thread and it paid off. I would like to thank everyone that participated in my thread, I got an e-mail the day before the article was posted from the THG saying that they took in consideration what was said in my thread and agreed that the interpetation was incorrect in some areas and the editor failed to mention things that were originaly in the article. They told me about the article and thanked me.
But I must agree that on the current market, the p4 2.2 is in the lead performance wise. But the average computer comsumer does not want to pay 200 dollars more for a few extra fps.
taylor
But this is PERFECT!!! I'm not sure if some of you remember but I started this whole thing about the p4 with my original P4 SUCKY!!! thread and it paid off. I would like to thank everyone that participated in my thread, I got an e-mail the day before the article was posted from the THG saying that they took in consideration what was said in my thread and agreed that the interpetation was incorrect in some areas and the editor failed to mention things that were originaly in the article. They told me about the article and thanked me.
But I must agree that on the current market, the p4 2.2 is in the lead performance wise. But the average computer comsumer does not want to pay 200 dollars more for a few extra fps.
taylor