the best you can do is insult me. you girls never change.
Let's see, I slammed Intel, and you took that as an insult to yourself? WTG.
When I informed you of your credibility, I was stating a rather harsh reality. I even apologized pre-emptively for "twisting the knife." Seeing as you're the one who completely blew your credibility, I don't see that you can have any legitimate problem with that statement.
Your an AMD lemming, the Inquirer is your bible. How can argue with that?
RoTFL LoLoL, calling theinquirer.net an "AMD lemming" bible is outright ludicrous. If you only read theinquirer.net a little more, you might actually find a great deal of anti-AMD ammo as well. And whether it was provable or just fanciful rumor, we all know you'd try to use it all the same. But you apparently don't even notice it, and that's your loss.
The truth hurts you guys bad it seems, the best you can do is insult me.
You don't exactly specialize in "truth."
Back in 1Q01, you kept trying to tell us the AMD760MP didn't exist even in usable prototype, it wasn't even going to be stable when it was released, etc. even when there were verified accounts of people running rock-solid prototype 760MP platforms with T-birds.
Not to mention these were the same T-birds you kept insisting were not SMP-capable. Then the 760MP was released, and AnandTech proved that T-birds in fact could run in SMP mode on the 760MP. That was pretty damn funny too. :lol:
You kept trying to tell us the AthlonMP+760MP platform was unstable. There were countless reliable sources refuting that claim, and the best linkage you could provide was a completely irrelevant Chinese hacker story. Nice going there.
You kept telling us that AMD would have to revise their PR rating once Northwood came out. Guess what, Northwood is out, and AMD's PR rating is still valid. In fact, it's still even conservative; an AthlonXP 2000+ still defeats a Nortwhood 2.0A. Perhaps you cracked your magic 8-ball by accident?
The MP and XP have the same core, the XP is supposed to have logic that prohibits use in MP scenario, correct?. it seems AMD has not implimented it or just plain stupid.
1) AMD never claimed to prohibit SMP on AthlonXP's. They just said it wasn't tested on XP's, and they wouldn't support it.
2) Intel has claimed for a long time that Celerons are "uniprocessor only." By your logic, Intel is "just plain stupid" as well. Whoops!
<i>If a server crashes in a server farm and no one pings it, does it still cost four figures to fix?