I have an ecs k7s5a mobo and it reads 37 C at idle. I installed motherboard monitor v5 and it reads 53 C (the only sensor that gave halfway believable temps). WHich one should I trust?
According to my mobo, the case temp is 22 C (that is accurate since it's about 2 C higher than room temp and I got a ton of fans blowing), and the socalled CPU temp is 37 C. I do think this is the CPU temp (accurate or not) since I did see it go up to 54 C when the HSF fan got disconnected.
As for mobo monitor, 54 is supposed to be the CPU temp from diode #2 or something. It has to be the CPU temp since nothing else in my system could be that high.
I wonder if the mobo monitor reads the temp inside the CPU whereas the mobo reads the temp around the socket? This would explain the 53 to 37 C difference.
hmmm
they both could be right...
a friend has something similar, got a a7a266 board, and u can choose 3 temps, one is the mobo, the other two are cpu, but ones around 46 the other 54... both go up and down according to CPU load.
i think the 46 one is the 'real' reading, while the 54 is the corrected asus reading.
anyways, if your computer is stable and not crashing, u really dont have anything to worry about.
The lack of thermal protection on Athlon's is cunning way to stop morons from using AMD.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.