Does this system sound good and stable?
I like to play games a lot and I have read about some freezing with similar systems. (maybe the sblive?)
The only parts I am willing to change are
Motherboard and Sound Card
Please let me know if you have any suggestions.
thanks
I back up intel_inside on the fact that you shouldn't kill performance by getting pc133 ram. That processor was made for going fast and should not be restricted because you got slow ram. I would go w/ pc2100 or even better 2400. Also, what are you going to be using this computer for? that will help us help you. Mnx4
Actually, you're wrong, as the Athlon isn't as bandwidth sensitive as the P4. In fact my 1.33GHz Athlon and 256MB PC133 CL2 RAM runs as fast as an AMD760-mobo with PC2100 DDR RAM in all gaming programs. Games only benefit from faster RAM at 640*480 where the CPU/RAM/Chipset is the bottleneck.
AMD technology + Intel technology = Intel/AMD Pentathlon IV; the <b>ULTIMATE</b> PC processor
Ahhh, lol. Do you ever get tired of being wrong Intel_inside. Why dont you try being logical, instead of opinionated all the time. I guess its hard when you have fallen victim to the Brain washing technics of Intel, and MS.
Ha you guys like to argue. Well anyway, im thinking of getting a Hercules Fortissimo II instead of the SBLive. I have been reading about conflicts between SBlive and VIA
Actually, you're wrong, as the Athlon isn't as bandwidth sensitive as the P4. In fact my 1.33GHz Athlon and 256MB PC133 CL2 RAM runs as fast as an AMD760-mobo with PC2100 DDR RAM in all gaming programs. Games only benefit from faster RAM at 640*480 where the CPU/RAM/Chipset is the bottleneck.
Not true, the amd760 chipset shows 10% improvement in performance across the board, including gaming benchmarks, unless you make it so the videocard is the bottleneck on purpose.
"The Cash Left In My Pocket,The BEST Benchmark"
No Overclock+stock hsf=GOOD!
DDR ram is better no matter what. At some point he will use this computer for something other than gaming. Then he will thank himself for going DDR. Besides Ram prices are still reasonable.
The SB live + via thing is a mystery to me. To be on the safe side, i would go with the hercules. Via's southbridge has issues IMO, in head to head benchmarks with other southbridges (ali, sis) the via sucked bad. There was bad latency, low transfer speeds, semi-regular hic-ups (brief pauses in transfers, which are bad for video capture and large file transfer). Take that for what its worth.
I am currently running a FIC AD-11 with the 761 reference design, no probs, no crashes, no freezes... EVER!
Good luck
Benchmarks are like sex, everybody loves doing it, everybody thinks they are good at it.
I would recommend an XP1600 and DDR since they will only cost slighty more(Well, DDR has gone up a lot recently so maybe more) but I see you are dead set on the T-Bird and PC133. Therefore, I will suggest "name" brand (not generic) PC133 and a Enermax PS (#365-350Watt-$55 or #465-430Watt-$80). Here is a link to some decent RAM that seems pretty reasonably priced. You will probably pay this much for crappy RAM anyway.
<A HREF="http://www.mushkin.com/cgi-bin/Mushkin.filereader?3c60eb7300998d1c2742c0a801020645+EN/products/990569" target="_new">mushkin PC150 $57</A>
Don't forget to get a decent HSF (Volcano6-cheapest -> Swiftech-best).
Try a motherboard with a 420-D nForce chipset (like the Asus A7N266-E) and sound would no longer be the source of conflicts, plus you'll benefit from the dual channel architecture of the memory interface with two identical DDR modules. Sure, the sound is not of the quality of an Audigy, but it is still pretty damn good for gaming. As for integrated graphics, you can switch that off and insert your GTS instead.
<font color=red>Floppy disk?!? What the heck's a floppy disk?!?</font color=red>
Or maybe go for a nForce 415D-based mobo. Also available from Asus. Look <A HREF="http://www.asus.com.tw/mb/socketa/a7n266-c/overview.htm" target="_new">here</A> for the specs. I know the thing is available here in Belgium, in Europe, so it MUST be back there in the US. (Or any onther part of the world)
The nForce performs like .5% slower than the Via KT266A when having onboard video. The removal of that thing can only have a positive effect, and gives you better chances in overclocking.
The biggest problem isn't that the SB Live! conflicts with Via chipsets, it's that they conflict with every piece of hardware and software ever produced. In other words, it sucks.
I've also heard good things about the Fortissimo II. Haven't been able to try one out myself yet, but I love my Game Theater XP.
I'd recommend the Abit KT7a-RAID for a motherboard if you're going with SDRAM. If you switch to DDR, then that's a horse of a different color.
Nope, I have it and it sux! Get an IWill KK266Plus, it's the best KT133A SDRAM mobo. My friend has one and it's a beauty. LHGPooBaa will definitely agree...
AMD technology + Intel technology = Intel/AMD Pentathlon IV; the <b>ULTIMATE</b> PC processor
OK heres my updated system specs:
AMD XP 1600+ 1.4Ghz 266 fsb
ECS K7S5A Mboard
256 mb pc133 sdram (may upgrade later)
Visiontek Geforce2 GTS 32mb
Hercules Fortissimo II sound card
WD 40gb 7200 HD
I have a few questions about this though:
*Can I disable the onboard sound on the card so I can use my on sound card?
*Will the ECS K7S5A Mboard take advantage of the AMD XP cpu? (I read something about older boards not using it correctly)
*Is the onboard NIC good or will I need to buy a separate network card?
TRhe kt7a raid does not suck, do you have any proof the kk is better?
From what I recall back in the sdram board days, those two boards were neck and neck, and I would take abits overclocking features over any other companies ANY day.
"The Cash Left In My Pocket,The BEST Benchmark"
No Overclock+stock hsf=GOOD!
*Can I disable the onboard sound on the card so I can use my on sound card?
*Will the ECS K7S5A Mboard take advantage of the AMD XP cpu? (I read something about older boards not using it correctly)
*Is the onboard NIC good or will I need to buy a separate network card?
Yes
Yes, ecs had quality control issues in the past, from what ive seen in forums of late, it has been cleared up, but if you get a doa board you will know it right away, dont bother trying to trouble shoot, rma immediatly.
A nic is a nic, the onboard one is better IMO, due to the fact that it frees up a pci slot and you save 10-20 bucks.
Nothing a home user does even begins to saturate the bandwidth of a 10/100 nic, so if the onboard nic is 5% slower than an add on card(made up number mind you) you would never stress the card enough to make it noticeable. So the onboard nic is fine.
"The Cash Left In My Pocket,The BEST Benchmark"
No Overclock+stock hsf=GOOD!
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.