Year of the Horse & Thoroughbred: coincidence?

I wouldn't be surprised, in fact it's not a bad idea of keeping track of what cores were released what year.

However, this isn't the year of the Miscellaneous Hardware, either.

<font color=orange>Quarter</font color=orange> <font color=blue>Pounder</font color=blue> <font color=orange>Inside</font color=orange>

Does that mean that next year is the Year of the Mallet?

The holder of <i>this</i> pass is <b>exempt</b> from all forms of <font color=red>flaming</font color=red>.

Way to be racist, good job. I think this marks a new low for you, but trust me you've earned it all.

The holder of <i>this</i> pass is <b>exempt</b> from all forms of <font color=red>flaming</font color=red>.

I was referring to the blue man group that intel used in the commercials, you would have to be living under a rock to not know about that. Sad, people taking anything I say and trying to twist it.

<i>My life wasn't complete untill I tried sse-2 optimized pong</i>

... and sometimes, we don't have to twist it as you've done all the work for us!

The holder of <i>this</i> pass is <b>exempt</b> from all forms of <font color=red>flaming</font color=red>.

chill dude, I don't like the guy at ALL, but you're wrong here.

<i>Better to be silent and thought an idiot than to speak and remove all doubt.</i>

I'm gonna defend you on this one, he took it the wrong way.
However, ragging on people's attitude here is just gonna make it worse, as most of us think you have an attitude problem yourself.

IN OTHER WORDS, WHY DON'T ALL OF YOU TRY TO ACT LIKE YOU'RE PAST THE THIRD GRADE.

<i>Better to be silent and thought an idiot than to speak and remove all doubt.</i>

Actually, AMD doesn't get their PR ratings out of the blue. They use a third-party benchmarking group to compare them to equally clocked T-Birds.

AMD technology + Intel technology = Intel/AMD Pentathlon IV; the <b>ULTIMATE</b> PC processor

I admit he has been relaxed a bit off his trolling, but I wouldn't get my mind off him any second still.
Give him a month and see the results.
As for Fugger, well we lost him...
As for Melty, he's still this forum's most idiotic unreasonable and low-life Troll.

--
The other day I heard an explosion from the other side of town.... It was a 486 booting up...

And the third-party benchmarking group you are talking about is Arthur Anderson. You know the same Firm who were incharge of Enron's paper works, they were also advisor to Enron. I hope you understand, that only thing they are there for is to make sure that they have a small print on the benchmarks saying it's compared to Equally clocked T-Birds and not P4's. Not that it would make a difference, since the benchmarks wouldn't change.

KG

Yeah, it does the job, much like the i845 chipset does the job. Get over it, both companies prey on the clueless. A 1.4GHz P4 paired with PC133 SDRAM is as bad as confusing people to think that an AXP 2000+ is actually 2GHz. The only saving graces are that a person getting a i845 based system is probably more worried about price than performance, and with the AXP 2000+, it does perform comparable to a 2.0A NW, so you still get a blazingly fast machine (unless that too is paired with PC133 SDRAM). Needless to say, both companies are predators, and I don't mind. I know better, and I do my best to educate the people with mistaken ideas, but I don't feel sorry for those who are duped in the end, or those who choose to not listen.

-SammyBoy

Intel_inside, dont go anywhere. Your one of the only reasonable Pro-Intel people left. Someone has to tell us AMD people Intel's side of the story. Mainly because I cant bring myself to read anything about intel without getting nausious. So we really need you.
Second, I have no idea why AMD chose horses for model names. But it does give an odd visual. Picture this: AMD and Intel kiss and make up. The new combined company logo is the Space-suit guy riding a horse. hmmmm.. anything is possible.

Benchmarks are like sex, everybody loves doing it, everybody thinks they are good at it.

Actualy, my first responce was that calling the P4 aliens "coloured people" was a bit of a stretch, because they weren't people.

Don't be so sensitive about someone or something that you asume that the person means something bad.

This is a non-smoking forum.
If your computer is smoking, please extinguish it immediately.