linux compiling really faster on a AXP XEON coming

[juin]

http://www.gamepc.com/reviews/hardware_review.asp?review=xeon22&page=8&mscssid=&tp=

That not the best bench i have see but there is no real good bench for workstation

cheap, cheap. Think cheap, and you'll always be cheap.AMD version of semi conducteur industrie

 

[Matisaro]

Hmm 2x xeons are 8 seconds faster than 2x 1900 MP's, for about 600 bucks more total....sounds like a great deal to me!

::rolls eyes::

PS: One 2000+ is only 3 seconds slower than a 2.2NW, for 300 less, thats 100 bucks a second.

Bravo intel tho, higest linux compile(from this benchmark set).

"The Cash Left In My Pocket,The BEST Benchmark"
No Overclock+stock hsf=GOOD!

 

[priit]

<A HREF="http://www6.tomshardware.com/cpu/02q1/020128/octitans-16.html " target="_new">http://www6.tomshardware.com/cpu/02q1/020128/octitans-16.html </A>
<A HREF="http://www.linuxhardware.org/article.pl?sid=02/01/23/1016241" target="_new">http://www.linuxhardware.org/article.pl?sid=02/01/23/1016241</A>

P4 still generally seems to suck in kernel compiling performance, northwood or not.My 1Ghz athlon also compiles kernel about 1 minute faster than my 1.5Ghz P4...

 

[bront]

Personaly, I found it interesting that the AXP 2000+ did so much better than the AMP 1900+. There shouldn't be that much difference between a 1900+ and 2000+, and MP and XP should be the same except for SMP.

Or did I miss something and they used a different MB for the XP?

I do not like it Tom you see,
I do not like green PCB.