Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > Science mark benchmark: P4-2.4 vs. XP2100+

Science mark benchmark: P4-2.4 vs. XP2100+

Forum CPU & Components : CPUs - Science mark benchmark: P4-2.4 vs. XP2100+

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Found a good review with relevant tech-benchmarks:
http://www.tech-report.com/reviews [...] dex.x?pg=1

Some results:

memory bandwidth is (*only*) 23% faster with RDRAM as compared with 266MHz DDR

"ScienceMark is the Athlon XP's home turf, which it defends well."
Like 7% faster than a 2.4GHz P4 with RDRAM!

"Plus, the Athlon just cranks on computationally intensive tasks."

<font color=blue>gnintsakgnirkskir ksron</font color=blue>

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

One thing to remember about RDRAM/DDR bandwidth effectiveness is that there are a total of two RDRAM desktop chipsets out (one for P3 one for P4), and...11? DDR desktop chipsets total (SiS - 735 and 645; Via - P3 chipset, KT266, KT266a, KT333, P4X266, P4X266a; Ali - Magik 1, P3 chipset; AMD - 761).
I think the next RDRAM chipset will show better use of the available bandwidth.

Interesting that the P4 didn't do better in Serious Sam 2, since it has some SSE2 optimizations..

<font color=blue>If you don't buy Windows, then the terrorists have already won!</font color=blue> - Microsoft

Reply to FatBurger
Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > Science mark benchmark: P4-2.4 vs. XP2100+
Go to:

There are 539 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them