Why is it that water-cooled setups are the ones most frequently used for overclocking tests? If one of the major problems with overclocking is heat generation, wouldn't a freon-based system like Kryotech or Vapochill be a more effective solution?
Or is it that water-cooling is good enough that additional cooling won't really change anything (on the other hand, doesn't resistance decrease as temperature decreases?)?
I've seen LN2 or Vapochill used a few times, but I think the reason watercooling is more wide-spread is simply because it's cheaper and easier to work with.
<font color=blue>If you don't buy Windows, then the terrorists have already won!</font color=blue> - Microsoft
I think it would mostly be because when you go past passive cooling (such as water cooling) to an active refrigerant then you have to worry about ambient humidity combining with the extremely cool heat exchanger on the CPU to cause water condensation on or around the CPU. Since no one likes running a system with a wet CPU, this means that you usually have to either keep such a system in a completely humidity-free controlled environment, or you have to add a heating element to the cooling system to prevent condensation and/or freezing.
Needless to say, this makes the water cooling system (which just uses water at ambient room temperature) a heck of a lot easier to set up and maintain.
If water isn't neato-keen enough for you though, you could always fill the system with pretty colored automobile anti-freeze.
<pre>Join PETT.(People for Equal Treatment of Trolls)
Trolls:Keeping bridges clean 'n safe.</pre><p>
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.