wait a second... i smell something familiar..*sniff* AH YES - FUD !!!
Thanks fugger for the FUD. So lets take this one point at a time.
"rushing and stumbling" - Whose rushing and how did they stumble? Cuz they didnt get T-bred by the launch date? Exactly how long did it take for Itanium to reach market? Eight or more years? I seem to recall intel having issues with the .13 transition too.
"consumers in the home market cannot use 64bit computing "
- Of course not, but the chip is still great at 32 bit computing as well. So who cares If ill never use 64 bit.
"in the server arena AMD cannot compete with SUN, MIPS, IBM, or PMC."
Your right, and their not trying to compete head-to-head. SledgeHammer is a low cost, backward compatible solution. Its not intended to compete with those $500,000 systems. Neither is Itanium. WHy didnt you throw in Intanium in that comparison? It cant compete either.
"Early samples of the Tbred have proven to be very poor overclockers "
I have my doubts about its ability to overclock. Even though its a smaller die, its the same core. And you can only push a core so far... shrunk or not.
A word to the impatient ones. Clearly AMD isnt where it wants to be right now. A die shrink is tricky business. Rather than bore you with the perils of a die shrink, ill just say: If you cant wait, buy Intel. Im sure the extra $150 for Intel's top of the line will seem worth it in a month when T-bred comes out.
Benchmarks are like sex, everybody loves doing it, everybody thinks they are good at it.