Is it me, or is AMD <i>trying</i> to confuse customers? Their latest buzz is that ClawHammer will be named Athlon. But Barton is also coming out, and it too will be named Athlon.
So AMD is releasing two completely different cores, both named Athlon. One is just like the Athlons that we have always known, except a smaller die with more cache. But it will run (supposedly) on all of the motherboards that we know, own, and/or love. It is a perfect extension to the Athlon family. (If not perhaps in need of a boost to its FSB.)
The other is a 32-bit/64-bit hybrid, completely capable of running both instruction sets natively <i>and</i> has an on-die single-channel DDR SDRAM memory controller. Even without consideration for the instruction differences, the differences in the way that this CPU interfaces with the motherboard <i>should</i> require a completely new chipset to function properly, if not a new socket as well. Yet it <i>also</i> named Athlon. Does anyone else see the problem here?
Does anyone else find this decision from AMD to be extremely stupid and hope that they change their minds before ClawHammer actually gets released? (Hopefully to rename the ClawHammer from Athlon to, well, <i>anything</i> else instead of just ripping everything out of the ClawHammer to the point where it is just a Barton with an x86-64 extension or releasing an 'Athlon' that is completely incompatible with all other previous Athlon motherboards, including its little brother, a true Athlon, released <i>at the same time</i>.)
Don't get me wrong. I'm not bashing AMD's technical kewlness. They've got a neato-keen concept in SledgeHammer/Opteron at the very least. It just sounds to me like they are poised to confuse the hell out of their less educated customers with the Athlons. Smart-uns like us will no doubt 'get it', but does that make it alright?
<pre>Join PETT.(People for Equal Treatment of Trolls)
Trolls:Keeping bridges clean 'n safe.</pre><p>
So AMD is releasing two completely different cores, both named Athlon. One is just like the Athlons that we have always known, except a smaller die with more cache. But it will run (supposedly) on all of the motherboards that we know, own, and/or love. It is a perfect extension to the Athlon family. (If not perhaps in need of a boost to its FSB.)
The other is a 32-bit/64-bit hybrid, completely capable of running both instruction sets natively <i>and</i> has an on-die single-channel DDR SDRAM memory controller. Even without consideration for the instruction differences, the differences in the way that this CPU interfaces with the motherboard <i>should</i> require a completely new chipset to function properly, if not a new socket as well. Yet it <i>also</i> named Athlon. Does anyone else see the problem here?
Does anyone else find this decision from AMD to be extremely stupid and hope that they change their minds before ClawHammer actually gets released? (Hopefully to rename the ClawHammer from Athlon to, well, <i>anything</i> else instead of just ripping everything out of the ClawHammer to the point where it is just a Barton with an x86-64 extension or releasing an 'Athlon' that is completely incompatible with all other previous Athlon motherboards, including its little brother, a true Athlon, released <i>at the same time</i>.)
Don't get me wrong. I'm not bashing AMD's technical kewlness. They've got a neato-keen concept in SledgeHammer/Opteron at the very least. It just sounds to me like they are poised to confuse the hell out of their less educated customers with the Athlons. Smart-uns like us will no doubt 'get it', but does that make it alright?
<pre>Join PETT.(People for Equal Treatment of Trolls)
Trolls:Keeping bridges clean 'n safe.</pre><p>