Raystonn r u there..?

[xcom_cheetah]

from xbitlabs.

If we disengage ourselves from the "processor's" latency and divide the numbers obtained by the corresponding clock frequency multipliers, we will get 17 for Athlon XP 2100+, 19 for Pentium 4 2.4B GHz with PC1066, 20.5 for Pentium 4 2.4B GHz with PC800 and 17 for Pentium 4 2.4GHz with PC800. In other words, the memory subsystem built with dual-channel PC800 RDRAM features the same latency as DDR333, PC800 RDRAM working asynchronously with 533MHz bus boasts a bit worse latency and the latency of PC1066 RDRAM is higher than that of PC800 RDRAM but at the same time better than the latency of the asynchronously working PC800 RDRAM.

i thought that PC 1066 should have lesser latency..?? is there any typos error ..?? secondly u r rite that DDR 333 latency is almost equal to PC 800..

 

[juin]

Yes less latency

-30 ns for faster FSB
-30 ns for faster RDRAM
according to XBITLAB

cheap, cheap. Think cheap, and you'll always be cheap.AMD version of semi conducteur industrie

 

[xcom_cheetah]

where is Raystonn..?? developing some apps for hyperthreading.. anyway no offense.. just joking..
but anybody really knows where he is found these days.?

 

[spud]

Hes very busy if you only knew what Intel was up to... if you only knew.

-Jeremy

<font color=blue>Just some advice from your friendly neighborhood blue man </font color=blue>

 

[FatBurger]

I sent Raystonn a PM some time ago and he never responded. So he's probably either busy at work or got caught up in Evercrack again :lol:

<font color=blue>Hi mom!</font color=blue>