Archived from groups: rec.games.frp.dnd (
More info?)
Matt Frisch wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 19:14:56 -0400, Werebat <ranpoirier@cox.net> scribed
> into the ether:
>
>
>>
>>Matt Frisch wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 07:09:06 -0400, Werebat <ranpoirier@cox.net> scribed
>>>into the ether:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Matt Frisch wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 10:06:58 +0200, Jasin Zujovic <jzujovic@inet.hr>
>>>>>scribed into the ether:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>In article <3hr2bbFhusf8U1@individual.net>,
>>>>>>m.blundenATntlworld.com@address.invalid says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Wands don't mishap.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Are you sure? Look at the picture of Lidda in the original 3.0 PHB
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>That's if you use "activate blindly". Clearly Lidda doesn't recognise a wand
>>>>>>>when she sees it (or mistook it for something else).
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Heh, heh... that naughty Lidda!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>It is supposed to be a PG rated book. Putting the scorch marks....there...
>>>>>would shift the book into Elfbard territory.
>>>>
>>>>She may have thought it was a "Rod of Oral Gratification"...
>>>
>>>
>>>Well c'mon now, what's the point if the rod isn't attached to anything?
>>
>>You have to remember that that picture was from BEFORE WotC came out
>>with the Warforged...
>
>
> In which case, the picture might be interpretted as a critical success, not
> a critical failure.
>
> To quote Fry: I never thought I'd die like this, but I'd always hoped.
LOL, just watched that episode on DVD with the missus last week.
- Ron ^*^