/ Sign-up
Your question

Athlon XP 2000 handle heat better than a 1700 oc?

  • CPUs
  • Heat
  • Cooling
  • Windows XP
Last response: in CPUs
May 23, 2002 6:35:18 PM

Does an Athlon XP 2000 (1.67 ghz) run any cooler than a 1700 (stock 1.47) overclocked at 1.67 ghz? I guess its a dumb question, but I don't know, maybe the 2000 has a bigger die which would transfer heat faster (more surface area).

Assume the same hsf.


A newbie is only a newbie for as long as you allow him to be.
-Anonymous Veteran

More about : athlon 2000 handle heat 1700

May 24, 2002 12:48:23 AM

On average the 2000+ will run slightly cooler due to its higher bin and better manufacturing, however the 1700+ may have been downbinned for demand, so you could get a 1700+ which runs as cool.

In reality though, if thje 1700+ can hit 2000+ stable(99% of the time it can) their tempratures would vary only slightly from eachother.

:wink: The Cash Left In My Pocket,The BEST Benchmark :wink:
May 24, 2002 12:57:00 AM

generally yes.

the 2000+ is generally a higher quality core, unless the 1700+ has been downbinned.

however should u get a particulary sweet overclocking 1700+ that runs at 1.75v at 2000+ speeds they will both produce the same amount of heat.

moreoften however the 1700+ requires a small voltage boost to let it run stable at 2000+, and the higher voltage means it has a bigger heat output.

:lol:  Whats better, <font color=blue>Intel</font color=blue> or <font color=green>AMD?</font color=green> :lol: