2000 vs XP

jmarble

Distinguished
Feb 25, 2003
5
0
18,510
Hi. I am building a new computer for home. It will mainly be used for gaming. I can't decide what OS to load...XP Pro or 2000 Pro. I am concerned about compatibility and of course speed. Any hints/suggestions would be greatly appreciated to help me decide. Thanks.
 

Teq

Distinguished
Feb 16, 2003
1,519
0
19,780
For gaming... XP.

But... for speed, turn off all the eye candy, zip file and cd burner support as well as all the services you don't need.

That will leave you with essentially win2k... but with the advanced compatibility features of XP.

If gaming is secondary... go with win 2k. It's smaller, faster and more stable... but there isn't a lot of support for DOS games.


<b>(</b>It ain't better if it don't work.<b>)</b>
 

jmarble

Distinguished
Feb 25, 2003
5
0
18,510
Do you know where I could find a good site explaining how to turn off all the eye candy and services I don't need?

Thanks.
 

Teq

Distinguished
Feb 16, 2003
1,519
0
19,780
Your best bet is to download TWEAKUI from Microsoft:<A HREF="http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/pro/downloads/powertoys.asp" target="_new">http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/pro/downloads/powertoys.asp</A>

Hey, don't laugh... they actually did a good job on this version!


Also cruise through the Display, Taskbar and System properties... lots of good tweaks in there too!

For the services and registry tweaks, go here: <A HREF="http://snakefoot.fateback.com/tweak/winnt/default.html" target="_new">http://snakefoot.fateback.com/tweak/winnt/default.html</A>


Both win2k and XP are highly configurable...



<b>(</b>It ain't better if it don't work.<b>)</b>
 

namek0

Distinguished
Oct 21, 2002
589
0
18,980
This is purely an opinion, but I feel that 2000 is a lot more stable than XP. I've 2000 and xp on different computers, and generally the 2000 stays on a lot longer than the xp.

But, the xp does about 20x the gaming as the 2000 too. Whatever, I think equally of them both

It's all good ^_^
 

Teq

Distinguished
Feb 16, 2003
1,519
0
19,780
:smile: There was a time when I was doing a lot of downloading. I would leave the computer on for days at a time and just let the Kazaa and WinMX run in the background. My continuous uptime (i.e. time since last shutoff or reboot) actually went over 1000 hours!

Win2k pro is undoubtedly the most stable version of windows.

I just wish they'd work on compatibility with DOS games!



<b>(</b>It ain't better if it don't work.<b>)</b>
 

elzt

Distinguished
May 10, 2002
1,141
0
19,280
I have Win2K running on the PCs in both my office and home. They hardly crash at all. As for the compatibility issue, there's no need to worry about either. Almost all common software available on the market will work under W2K, unless you're talking about those ancient DOS programs.
 

RobD

Champion
2k is far better, ultra-stable.

I don't like the fancy looks of XP (I know you can turn it off, that ain't the point), but MS have come up with "My First Operating System". Yuk.
 

Teq

Distinguished
Feb 16, 2003
1,519
0
19,780
I don't like the look of XP either. It leaves the impression of something written for --or by-- 12 year olds.

Win2k has been very good to me.



<b>(</b>It ain't better if it don't work.<b>)</b>
 

dhlucke

Polypheme
XP is 2000 with more features.

Both are rock stable.

I would go with XP.

<font color=red>
<A HREF="http://kevan.org/brain.cgi?dhlucke" target="_new">The French are being described as cheese-eating surrender monkeys.</A></font color=red>
 

zwaarst

Distinguished
Dec 31, 2007
139
0
18,680
I have 2000, and it is rock stable.
when i an behind a XP system, i can't find a thing. I always get the feeling that al the options are gone.
But if you are goung to buy a P4 system with a CPU of 3.06 Ghz (those have HP) you better install XP because it benefints from HP an will make your system faster. You have to disable all the usless things, otherwise you trow away all the extra speed you got from yhe HP.

about the comment that XP=2000+featers ME=98SE+featers, but more featers make things instable, and ME sertenly proves that. and my persenal expirence is that XP also proves that, but that is just an opinion.

(sorry for the poor englishe, i had no time to use the dictonary)

<font color=red>duk-tape is like the force, it has a bright side and a dark side, and it keeps the universe together.</font color=red><P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by zwaarst on 03/27/03 11:38 AM.</EM></FONT></P>
 

Teq

Distinguished
Feb 16, 2003
1,519
0
19,780
Sadly, I think they are writing them for the youth market. In a world where Mattel sells Barbie and Hotwheels computers, what do you expect?

The good news is that all that bizarre crap can be turned off.



--->It ain't better if it don't work<---
 

Teq

Distinguished
Feb 16, 2003
1,519
0
19,780
LOL... check it out...<A HREF="http://barbiepc.tripod.com/index.htm" target="_new">http://barbiepc.tripod.com/index.htm</A>


--->It ain't better if it don't work<---
 

CompSci

Distinguished
Feb 6, 2001
411
0
18,780
"XP is 2000 with more features." <- ???????

It's more like...
XP is a client subset of Win 2K with feature limitations!

Load up W2K with all SP's, IE6, MediaPlayer9, goodie updates and toys.

XP is just a client with Barbie dress!