[citation][nom]soupheadb[/nom]Wouldn't businesses be better off with an Intel Celeron or a low power AMD Athlon (single/dual) core?[/citation]
i agree, atom is way to get more money from older hardware.
sure new cpus are overkill, who needs a quad core to read their email.
people would save money and get better performance from using older amds. i still like dual cores over single cores, you get a better experience.
then again who needs vista, windows xp is much better, most businesses just dont need vista and 3-4 gb bloat tax for running vista over xp which does nicely with 512-1gb
since xp will not be an option soon, linus really gets an opportunity to deliver a desktop distribution that runs on low end amd with 512-1gb and that does things that most people do. like email, web browsing, basic word processing and spreadsheet, photos, music, ect
microsoft i think is making a big mistake dropping xp and forcing people into higher end hardware. i mean i need 2 gb just to run vista smoothly, that's nuts.