http://www.forumdeluxx.com/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic&f=8&t=000751
Thats a t-bred 1.733 GHZ @ 2.31 GHZ
A 34 % overlcock
Thats a t-bred 1.733 GHZ @ 2.31 GHZ
A 34 % overlcock
1)
2) extract from the image: Floppy disk(s) fail(40)
to oc a cpu & boot up the comp, it is one thing (even with a POST passing),
but to test it under Windows XP OS or other operating system it is another thing!
it is just a TROLL. haha.
pass your way, modify another picture & make a better work, next time. haha.
<i>if <b>you know</b> <font color=white>you don't know</font color=white>, the way could be more easy ...
yeah! right. Cock!
2) extract from the image: Floppy disk(s) fail(40)
to oc a cpu & boot up the comp, it is one thing (even with a POST passing),
but to test it under Windows XP OS or other operating system it is another thing!
it is just a TROLL. haha.
pass your way, modify another picture & make a better work, next time. haha.
<i>if <b>you know</b> <font color=white>you don't know</font color=white>, the way could be more easy ...
add-on
i didnt say here it is impossible, i dont know.
maybe with a cpu from a good series & a bit some chance you can succeed this OC.
but here, i dont think its a real oced test.
<i>if <b>you know</b> <font color=white>you don't know</font color=white>, the way could be more easy ...
i didnt say here it is impossible, i dont know.
maybe with a cpu from a good series & a bit some chance you can succeed this OC.
but here, i dont think its a real oced test.
<i>if <b>you know</b> <font color=white>you don't know</font color=white>, the way could be more easy ...
I can post at sick numbers if I wanted to use a camera and take a pic of my screen. But that is very lame.
10% stable overclock is more realistic.
Here is a post from Sampsa (from your link) a legit overclocker.
"Hello,
Here is a picture of my Athlon XP 2000+ posting 2438MHz. It's Liquid nitrogen cooled.
Sorry about the lines on the screen but some reason 195MHz FSB was too much for display adapter.
The reason of Unknown CPU is that when the CPU is too cold it somehow loses the L2 cache and only 64kB is working."
I have known for a long time that the L2 cache will not be able to handle high speeds. 50% overclocks are not possible.
<A HREF="http://www.maximumoc.com/img/random/stupid_chopped_picture.jpg" target="_new">Sitra from Italy</A> claims to have broken 2.3Ghz too and his L2 dropped off early as well. Sitra would also hold the AMD "Pi" record at 47 seconds if people didnt think his SS's were fake. His thread was deleted off his <A HREF="http://www.atris.it/" target="_new">forum</A> (Sitra is a mod or admin) and SS removed.
<A HREF="http://www.atris.it/video.avi" target="_new">Alien Autopsy video</A>
You are limited to what your mind can perceive.
10% stable overclock is more realistic.
Here is a post from Sampsa (from your link) a legit overclocker.
"Hello,
Here is a picture of my Athlon XP 2000+ posting 2438MHz. It's Liquid nitrogen cooled.
Sorry about the lines on the screen but some reason 195MHz FSB was too much for display adapter.
The reason of Unknown CPU is that when the CPU is too cold it somehow loses the L2 cache and only 64kB is working."
I have known for a long time that the L2 cache will not be able to handle high speeds. 50% overclocks are not possible.
<A HREF="http://www.maximumoc.com/img/random/stupid_chopped_picture.jpg" target="_new">Sitra from Italy</A> claims to have broken 2.3Ghz too and his L2 dropped off early as well. Sitra would also hold the AMD "Pi" record at 47 seconds if people didnt think his SS's were fake. His thread was deleted off his <A HREF="http://www.atris.it/" target="_new">forum</A> (Sitra is a mod or admin) and SS removed.
<A HREF="http://www.atris.it/video.avi" target="_new">Alien Autopsy video</A>
You are limited to what your mind can perceive.
TRENDING THREADS
-
-
-
-
[SOLVED] Is it safe to use a recapped PSU for a long time ?- Started by zwtch_17
- Replies: 7
-
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram