lol you too?
but now i hae a serious comment to make regarding the cellery article.
i noticed toms benchmarked the systems with DDR or RDRAM, which is perfectly acceptable.
problem is, we are dealing with <font color=blue>BUDGET PROCESSORS.</font color=blue> and such processors and invariably coupled with other budget components like SDRAM, geforce2MX/TNT2/integrated graphics and so on.
example: i have two friends who got nice duron systems. perfectly adequate for their needs. do they use DDR? no. both use the KT133 chipset.
And as we all know, using SDRAM lowers the performance. <font color=red>BUT</font color=red> as previous benchmarks have shown, the P4 architecture is especially vulnerable to performance degredation using SDRAM. course the duron is too, but not nearly as bad.
so i believe the testing methadology for budget processors is somewhat flawed.
dont believe me? go out there and have a look at the system specs of many OEM rigs that use durons or cellerons. And see if you can find a P4 celleron rig using ddr/rdram or DDR for a duron.
<font color=green>Hamsters</font color=green> <font color=red>don't</font color=red> <font color=green>play</font color=green> <font color=red>Soccer.</font color=red>