i have a curious question that you overclockers out there may (or maynot) be able to answer.
in your experience, is there any correlation between theoverclockability of a specific CPU and its ability to run at stock speeds BELOW the stock voltage?
note: this applies to both amd & intel cpu's.
i know my now retired tbird 1200C could only reliably do 1400, and at 1200 it would only undervolt to around 1.70-1.71 volts (full load of course)
All Athlon processors have a different 4 to 5 letter code starting with the letter 'A' written on the top. My old Tbird was an AVIA, though AXIA was more common (and better) around that time.
Theoretically, it should. That's obvious to anyone who knows why you increase the voltage in the first place. However, there are always things that will affect this (a.k.a. problems with the chip fab, etc.). Well, I guess I'll take that back, if the chip fab was bad, you should have equal problems overclocking it as you do "undervolting" it. It's all based on the same theory. There's an astoundingly good review I read once of how to overclock and why you increase the voltage (even taught me some things I didn't know before), but I have no idea where it was. Try doing a google search for the article (something like "how to overclock" might work). Again, I would say that the answer to your question is yes, it should be an indicator of overclocking performance.
She said "I love a man in tight jeans" and I said "They're not supposed to be tight I just got fat."
Well, I drop the voltage for another reason but can help. I have a 1.2 Tbird and, because I wanna run it as cool as posible (don't ask, just hot weather and bad air flow, not a good combination). The mobo is an Epox 8KHA+ and allows me to put up to -0.1, so now it runs at 1.68 (the 0.03 plus I think it's for PSU miscalibration). No problems at all.
On the other side I just can tell you that runs ok at 1.33, but haven't overclock the voltage yet, but I can assure that at 1.4 and 1.75 it's unstable.
Now generally and as others say, seems logic that the lower the volts a CPU can run stable, means more quality, less "impurities" in it, so need also less voltage when overclocking. As far as I konw, increase voltage reason is make the electrical signal "jump" correctly throw a not so perfect specific gate by giving more power. Sorry if this explanation seems anything but technically accurate, but that's not my field. Hope I have made my point clear.
thus i wanted to know if there was any kind of correlation, or if there was a practical lower limit
not too long ago there was this guy on these forums complaining that his Duron 1.2 or 1.3 was running at 1.4volts!
dunno how true it was though...
more info on my XP1800+ AGOGA
on bootup tonite i lowered the voltage by 0.025v to 1.675 Volts, which gives me a MBM reading that flickers between 1.66 and 1.68.
20mins of toast, 1 run of prime95 and an hour of 100% cure for cancer and its still running fine
<font color=purple>All advice I offer has been
Audited by Arthur Anderson.</font color=purple>
I think that guy was me, I didn´t return it, and yes my 1,3GHz Duron is still running at 1,45v, has been for a few months now. It´s very cool too 28°C-32°C with a 12$ HSF and no case fans.
The reason I was complaining was because I thought it was a bad CPU, since it was at 1,45v instead of 1,75v (maybe it couldn´t take much power, and therefore be a bad overclocker). I was about to return it and get a new one, but it´s working perfectly!
1,45v is posted in BIOS under "System Health" and also displayed in Motherboard Monitor. 1,45v is the default voltage for the CPU, I can set it as high as 1,85v in BIOS, but 1,45v is selected when I set the voltage to auto. I believe it´s true, the displayed BIOS and MBM readings follow, when I set the vcore to something else.
It´s not really a big deal, who cares if the CPU is running at 32°C or 45°C anyways? As long as it´s running stable and can perform the tasks you want. I´m sure other Durons can also run at a 1,45v, there´s nothing special about the one I have, aside from the default voltage being 1,45v. Maybe all the Durons with the Morgan core can run on a low voltage?
I remember reading several claims in the forums at <A HREF="http://www.overclockers.com.au" target="_new">http://www.overclockers.com.au</A> that the old Tbird AXIA core overclocked a little better when undervolted in the 1.68 volt range. It didn't work with my AYHJAR which doesn't like undervolting at all.
<b>I have so many cookies I now have a FAT problem!</b>
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.