First of all, here's a link talking about romoured last-minute changes to Hammer, and some changes to Prescott:
<A HREF="http://www.geek.com/news/geeknews/2002june/bch20020626015137.htm" target="_new">http://www.geek.com/news/geeknews/2002june/bch20020626015137.htm</A>
I'm just so excited right now. It appears Prescott's release has accelerated, and it may actually have support for dual DDR-333, plus an integrated memory controller! OMG, It seems Intel is pulling out all the stops for Prescott. Read the article for full info.
Here's another article regarding Hammer:
<A HREF="http://www.geek.com/news/geeknews/2002june/bch20020626015146.htm" target="_new">http://www.geek.com/news/geeknews/2002june/bch20020626015146.htm</A>
And finally, the most exciting article:
<A HREF="http://www.geek.com/news/geeknews/2002june/bch20020627015159.htm" target="_new">http://www.geek.com/news/geeknews/2002june/bch20020627015159.htm</A>
In this article, it says that Intel's Otellini was <b>lying</b> when he said Prescott didn't have Yamhill. It seems it was some sort of ploy from Intel, no doubt made just as a joke for all of us enthusiasts out there. It seems Prescott and Hammer are shaping up to be real performance monsters.
We don't know for sure if all of this is true, but I really hope it is.
------------------------------------------------
Montecito & Chivano; Intel's Big Guns.
<A HREF="http://www.geek.com/news/geeknews/2002june/bch20020626015137.htm" target="_new">http://www.geek.com/news/geeknews/2002june/bch20020626015137.htm</A>
I'm just so excited right now. It appears Prescott's release has accelerated, and it may actually have support for dual DDR-333, plus an integrated memory controller! OMG, It seems Intel is pulling out all the stops for Prescott. Read the article for full info.
Here's another article regarding Hammer:
<A HREF="http://www.geek.com/news/geeknews/2002june/bch20020626015146.htm" target="_new">http://www.geek.com/news/geeknews/2002june/bch20020626015146.htm</A>
And finally, the most exciting article:
<A HREF="http://www.geek.com/news/geeknews/2002june/bch20020627015159.htm" target="_new">http://www.geek.com/news/geeknews/2002june/bch20020627015159.htm</A>
In this article, it says that Intel's Otellini was <b>lying</b> when he said Prescott didn't have Yamhill. It seems it was some sort of ploy from Intel, no doubt made just as a joke for all of us enthusiasts out there. It seems Prescott and Hammer are shaping up to be real performance monsters.
We don't know for sure if all of this is true, but I really hope it is.
------------------------------------------------
Montecito & Chivano; Intel's Big Guns.