Archived from groups: rec.games.frp.dnd (
More info?)
Justisaur wrote:
> laszlo_spamhole@freemail.hu wrote:
> > Justisaur wrote:
> > > Malachias Invictus wrote:
> > > >
http://www.giantitp.com/Func0004.html
> > > >
> > >
> > > Hmm. Armor focus might be o.k. but it would allow higher ACs to people
> > > focued on dex (or with enhancement bonuses to it at later levels), and
> > > Armor Specialization seems a bit much combined with that, basically +3
> > > to ac for 2 feats.
> >
> > Only +2. Armor Focus doesn't grant AC.
>
> You missed my point. Armor Focus doesn't directly grant AC, but it
> increases max dex bonus, allowing one to go up one AC through dex, or
> through going to heavier armor.
Okay, yes. But Armor Focus only improves your AC if you're using
heavier armors (unless you have a _really_ high Dex). And heavier
armors can use the help; they're generally understood to be slightly
underpowered.
> > > Messing with AC & to hit's is a bit dangerous given
> > > the d20 is your range. The Armor Specialization also seems to be a
> > > "nameless" bonus, which seems a bad idea to me.
> >
> > No, it increases your armor bonus.
>
> Ah, same difference then, it will stack with anything.
True, but it won't help your touch AC.
> Thinking about Armor Focus, it is significantly better than Weapon
> Focus for a couple reasons, 1 is you don't need a particular kind of
> armor to overcome dr, so there's no reason to ever change the armor you
> are wearing, focusing on one armor isn't anywhere near the burden of
> focusing on one weapon. 2ndly no matter how high you get your attack,
> your opponent is still going to be able to hit you. This prevents
> damage through AC, which is much better. Also with shileds that get
> increased AC bonus you are giving up a significant ammount of damage
> either through using 2 handed weapons or 2 twf.
Okay, but there are a lot of opponents against whom armor won't help
(incorporal undead, mages, gaze attack monsters, etc). There are a
_lot_ fewer monsters against whom a good whack on the head with a
powerful weapon is useless.
> I definatly wouldn't allow it at this point.
Eh. I probably would.
Laszlo