As much as we try to avoid it, I think we need to take some time to consider that AMD could fail with the Hammer...As much as I hate to admit it, even being a fan of AMD in general, if their product fails, politically and economically, they are going to inevitably be pushed into a corner by Intel (not in a round room...). Everyone seems to be thinking that the Hammer will blow away everything, but i'm starting to think otherwise, and getting a bit more sucpicious of AMD's claims and dates.
Starting out, we have the .13um T-bred late arrival fiasco, and then some poor/decent yields...not a good sign, also leading to the dropping of SOI on the Barton. Additionally, the only working hammer *so far* is 800Mhz with limited benchmarks.
Now, in retalation, Intel is supposedly pushing for an early release of the Prescott and Yamhill with IA-64..I think (not x86-64 like AMD, right?* Sounds like stiff competition from a much more mature Pentium 4.
Now, on the other hand, what if the AMD Hammer delivers, and Intel get's knocked down another rung, would that be a serious coup? Probably not, but I doubt they would like another Athlon vs Katmai ordeal. Any opinions or thoughts on this?
"When there's a will, there's a way."
Starting out, we have the .13um T-bred late arrival fiasco, and then some poor/decent yields...not a good sign, also leading to the dropping of SOI on the Barton. Additionally, the only working hammer *so far* is 800Mhz with limited benchmarks.
Now, in retalation, Intel is supposedly pushing for an early release of the Prescott and Yamhill with IA-64..I think (not x86-64 like AMD, right?* Sounds like stiff competition from a much more mature Pentium 4.
Now, on the other hand, what if the AMD Hammer delivers, and Intel get's knocked down another rung, would that be a serious coup? Probably not, but I doubt they would like another Athlon vs Katmai ordeal. Any opinions or thoughts on this?
"When there's a will, there's a way."