choice AMD just because cheap,right?

I am not a enthusiasm,but i still choice AMD.for what?very simply ,just because amd+via chips=low price & good performance. I don't know why there are so many people regard the AMD choicer as enthusiasm,if one day intel lower it's product's price a lot ,i will choice intel ,,for what?just for price/perfomance ratio..welcome feedback
3 answers Last reply
More about choice cheap right
  1. Do you have any idea what an Intel processor would cost you, if there was no AMD to keep them in check, no matter whose flag you're waving, the competition between the two, is making it all affordable.

    You never know what you can do until you try.
  2. Quote:
    Do you have any idea what an Intel processor would cost you, if there was no AMD to keep them in check, no matter whose flag you're waving, the competition between the two, is making it all affordable.

    Competition is mostly good but there is at least one downside: CPUs get faster very quickly and developers write apps for them. The end result is that the customer spends more money because he has to upgrade his machine more often. If AMD wasn't around, there's a distinct possibility that we'd be spending *less* money on computing.

    Ritesh
  3. Agreed.

    However AMD does offer alot of O/C mesures. Crank (developer ofr amd) had said that with via working with amd, the target to provide to those who wish to compute faster and push the envelope. (O/C) To me that sound like enthusiasm.

    Also pay attention to the 64-bit and hyperfeed development, AMD will be at the same level in 2003. Wich will prove to appeal to the enthusiest

    -Tim

    It seems that every time I reboot my wallet gets smaller.
Ask a new question

Read More

CPUs Performance AMD Intel Product