A-Data Announces Big 500 GB SSD

Status
Not open for further replies.

skine

Distinguished
Feb 25, 2009
134
0
18,680
Forgive my ignorance, but do they make 3.5" SSDs? If not, what are the restrictions on SSDs which make 2.5" drives (and PCIe) more desirable other than the proliferation of notebooks/netbooks?

On a less serious note, did the author have to write "A-DATA Technology revealed it all today at CeBIT 2009, whipping out its little 2.5-inch wonder and dazzling onlookers[...]" ?
 

haze4peace

Distinguished
Mar 3, 2009
119
0
18,680
This is good news, SSDs are advancing very quickly. I'm willing to bet that by 2011 SSDs will become the standard storage medium. Competitive in price and size.
 

Tindytim

Distinguished
Sep 16, 2008
1,179
0
19,280
[citation][nom]haze4peace[/nom]This is good news, SSDs are advancing very quickly. I'm willing to bet that by 2011 SSDs will become the standard storage medium. Competitive in price and size.[/citation]
I really excited about these higher density SSDs because I was never interested in them. Now this means the prices on the lower capacity drivers will have to go down.
 

magicandy

Distinguished
Jun 8, 2008
295
0
18,780
Well-written.

I wonder if this will be cheaper than OCZ's new 1 TB PCIe SSD. I'm even surprised OCZ is selling that for such a low price compared to Fusion IO's current ridiculously priced monsters which can't even hold a candle to this in size.
 

Tindytim

Distinguished
Sep 16, 2008
1,179
0
19,280
[citation][nom]magicandy[/nom]Well-written.[/citation]
Was that a joke?

[citation][nom]magicandy[/nom]I wonder if this will be cheaper than OCZ's new 1 TB PCIe SSD. I'm even surprised OCZ is selling that for such a low price compared to Fusion IO's current ridiculously priced monsters which can't even hold a candle to this in size.[/citation]
This is an actual drive. The OCZ setup is just four 256GB drives in a RAID configuration.
 

jacobdrj

Distinguished
Jan 20, 2005
1,475
0
19,310
[citation][nom]skine[/nom]Forgive my ignorance, but do they make 3.5" SSDs? If not, what are the restrictions on SSDs which make 2.5" drives (and PCIe) more desirable other than the proliferation of notebooks/netbooks? On a less serious note, did the author have to write "A-DATA Technology revealed it all today at CeBIT 2009, whipping out its little 2.5-inch wonder and dazzling onlookers[...]" ?[/citation]


I am looking at it from the other side: Why not make 1.8" (pocket size) the 1 and only standard?

Had CD's been smaller, and been the main standard, (i.e. Sony MiniDisk) we would all be better off with smaller CD players, and eventually smaller DVD players, and all the way into bluray disks. Instead, because people didn't have any forsight in the 80's, instead of getting good quality on a large medium (Laser Disk) we got a medeocre quality on disks that are not big enough for home use, and too big for mobile use.

SSDs will keep having higher capacity, and die shrinks (more data density). So why not go with the 1.8" mobile standard, instead of the oversized 2.5", which are just too power hungry.

I mean, if they want to go big, so that we can share in larger capacity SSDs, why not just have a 5.25" SSD for home users?

I do belive that the 2.5" standard does offer the best compramise for now, and there are enclosures that allow for RAID arrays to be built inside 5.25" bays.

 

skine

Distinguished
Feb 25, 2009
134
0
18,680
jacobdrj: In general, I feel that the people who are most interested in the performance enhancement provided by SSDs are those who don't care as much about component size.

I know there are people out there who would rather buy a high performance but relatively large device than a low performance device with small dimensions, as long as the larger device will fit in their case.

For example, people routinely buy video cards that cover two slots, and some even have multiples within a single machine.

I know it's an exaggeration, but I think it is plausible that there is a market for a 5.25" HDD/SSD if it effected price or performance, though it may be technically impractical (as I said before, excuse my ignorance).
 

jacobdrj

Distinguished
Jan 20, 2005
1,475
0
19,310
If it reduced cost, and didn't compramise performance, yeah, I think the 5.25" SSDs would have a real niche. Ironically, with mechanical drives, the smaller the better, so the old Quantum Big Foot drives of the late 90's never caught on.
 

Shnur

Distinguished
Mar 9, 2009
169
0
18,680
I believe that a big 5.25" tray would be perfect, if they could manage to put 2 2.5" Making like a raid array like the one that OCZ made that plugs into a PCIe, but making this one go into a SATA2, maybe even plug 2 or 3 SATA2 cables into that 5.25" tray so there's more available bandwidth...
Just a though...
 

Shnur

Distinguished
Mar 9, 2009
169
0
18,680
I believe that a big 5.25" tray would be perfect, if they could manage to put 2 2.5" Making like a raid array like the one that OCZ made that plugs into a PCIe, but making this one go into a SATA2, maybe even plug 2 or 3 SATA2 cables into that 5.25" tray so there's more available bandwidth...
Just a though...
 

j5689

Distinguished
Mar 15, 2009
18
0
18,510
What I just realized is that once this drive comes out, SSDs will have fully caught up with HDDs in the consumer 2.5" market in terms of storage capacity. Definitely not price though, I'd bet this thing is at least $600-700 when it comes out whereas a current 500GB laptop drive is ~ $100.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.