IS ATHLON GETTING SLOWER???

[AmdMELTDOWN]

is it me or is AMD's flagchip getting slower? in some tests the xp is really patheic.

f**k it, I wanna sue AMD.

"<b>AMD/VIA!</b>...you are <i>still</i> the weakest link, good bye!"

 

[Jake75]

Oh, look who we have here, isn´t it our beloved Melty...

Long time no see.

<font color=blue>*</font color=blue><font color=red>**</font color=red>
<font color=white>***</font color=white>
<font color=red>***</font color=red>

 

[lhgpoobaa]

melty... you seem to allways set extreemly low standards and fail to achieve them. Just <b>HOW</b> do you do it?

<b>MegaHertz Matters! ... But not without Cache our a decent chipset!!! </b>

 

[Kelledin]

Practice makes perfect, I suppose.

By the way, you ever notice how he always trolls the board more when AMD does well?

*sniff* I smell <i><b>fear!</b></i> :lol:

<A HREF="http://skarpsey.dyndns.org/" target="_new">Skarpsey</A>

 

[IIB]

Any chip with a fixed FSB speed actully scales worsten as clockspeed increses. so you cant have a real metric (liner) mhz/preformance ratio.

This post is best viewed with common sense enabled

 

[AMD_Man]

Any chip with a fixed FSB speed actully scales worsten as clockspeed increses. so you cant have a real metric (liner) mhz/preformance ratio.

Which is why AMD altered their PR ratings slightly to compensate for that. The Athlon XP desperately needs an FSB boost.


Intelligence is not merely the wealth of knowledge but the sum of perception, wisdom, and knowledge.

 

[bikeman]

f**k it, I wanna sue AMD.

WOOHOO!!! Like that one, though ...

Bikeman

<i>Then again, that's just my opinion</i>

 

[xxsk8er101xx]

Litagation is the heart of all evil.

<A HREF="http://www.anandtech.com/mysystemrig.html?id=9933" target="_new"> My Rig </A>

 

[nja469]

Which is why AMD altered their PR ratings slightly to compensate for that. The Athlon XP desperately needs an FSB boost.

How right you are. They need to consider saying the hell with 166 and engineer like hell for a 200MHz chip and chipsets. Otherwise AMD's future 333MHz won't be sh!t compared to Intel's future 667MHz which is obviously still DOUBLE like it is today with 266 and 533!

"Opinions are like assholes, everyone has one"

 

[dhlucke]

Reaching out for a new low, huh?

<font color=red>I have a computer and it does weird stuff. please help.</font color=red>

 

[buddry]

He wasn't even funny this time either :frown:

<font color=blue>Unofficial Forum Cop</font color=blue>

 

[Crashman]

AMD didn't do well, compared to their past processors they did mediocre.

<font color=blue>You're posting in a forum with class. It may be third class, but it's still class!</font color=blue>

 

[lhgpoobaa]

yeah. at lest he could have made it amusing.
*sighs* so hard to find decent trolls nowerdays.

<b>MegaHertz Matters! ... But not without Cache our a decent chipset!!! </b>

 

[slickstaa]

in your sig, is that supposed to be <font color=red> or</font color=red> a decent chipset?
wow kinda sad that thats all that i can think to post in this thread.
Cheers melty.

<font color=blue> If it ain't broke, don't fix it...tweak it.</font color=blue>

 

[Stick_e_Mouse]

lol

<b><font color=blue>Via chipsets, SiS chipsets -- all the same...all made in TAIWAN!