I admit this is one of AMD's big mistakes, releasing the Tbred A.
I did not root for the next stepping, I clearly stated that there is something wrong in the core itself, and that it has to be rechecked. AMD didn't just go to redesign for Barton, they cared about their current core and redid the adjustment needed. Intel released the 1.13GHZ, unstable, but they didn't try to fix it or anything, they just stayed at 1GHZ until the 0.13m batches started.
Sadly you are indeed an intel fanboy, because you perceive what I say as fanboyism. I had every right to say "IN YOUR FACE". I stated above an example of how people didn't even beleive it was a Tbred core problem, since the Palominos could OC better, yet everyone thought I and Matisaro were just rabid fanboys. We had an open mind, we won finally.
And BTW, when you think about it, if the NW tops out at around 3.4GHZ and does NOT reach 4GHZ before 0.09m, that proves AMD's process yeilds so far is somewhat better than Intel's. P4 has 20 stages, it SHOULD theoretically top out at twice the speed of an AXP in the same process. So if the AXP tops out at 2.5GHZ with 0.13m, and Intel's stops at less than 4GHZ, AMD has the better yeilds IMO, despite the P4 being a huge scalar processor.
May this sound pro-AMD, I don't care, it's the truth, face it!
--
Is the opportunity to earn money by working, free?