Hi all its been ages since I posted a thread.
All I can say is that I am eagerly waiting for AMD to release thier Hammer based processors in 2003. It has been long stated by AMD in thier presentations that Hammer processors will offer 20-25% performance increase than the Athlon (<A HREF="http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/content_type/DownloadableAssets/Opteron_Press_Preso2.pdf" target="_new">Source - p.13</A>). 5% due to on core enhancements and 20% due to the integrated memory controller.
Is this percentage comparing Hammer to the Palamino, T-bred or Barton ? Cause if AMD are stating only 5% increase in performance due to on core enhancements I am thinking they are comparing it a Barton. If they were comparing it to a T-bred I should think the figure should be more like 10%.
If my assumptions are true this could mean that Hammer may perform 20-25% better than Barton.
What you reckon ?
<font color=purple>Ladies and Gentlemen, its...Hammer Time !</font color=purple>
All I can say is that I am eagerly waiting for AMD to release thier Hammer based processors in 2003. It has been long stated by AMD in thier presentations that Hammer processors will offer 20-25% performance increase than the Athlon (<A HREF="http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/content_type/DownloadableAssets/Opteron_Press_Preso2.pdf" target="_new">Source - p.13</A>). 5% due to on core enhancements and 20% due to the integrated memory controller.
Is this percentage comparing Hammer to the Palamino, T-bred or Barton ? Cause if AMD are stating only 5% increase in performance due to on core enhancements I am thinking they are comparing it a Barton. If they were comparing it to a T-bred I should think the figure should be more like 10%.
If my assumptions are true this could mean that Hammer may perform 20-25% better than Barton.
What you reckon ?
<font color=purple>Ladies and Gentlemen, its...Hammer Time !</font color=purple>