I don't see the reason for this article. We already know that new Celeron was a bad overclocker and more L2 cache was what it needs.
Obviously P4 are far better, if not Intel would be quite stupid, isn't it? The reason of the article was to see the distance between both in every benchmark's graphic?
Also, some questins arises: the results are with DDR or RAMBUS, which chipset, maybe they made an average of all, ... ¿?
I have seen much more interesting articles than this.
DIY: read, buy, test, learn, reward yourself!
Obviously P4 are far better, if not Intel would be quite stupid, isn't it? The reason of the article was to see the distance between both in every benchmark's graphic?
Also, some questins arises: the results are with DDR or RAMBUS, which chipset, maybe they made an average of all, ... ¿?
I have seen much more interesting articles than this.
DIY: read, buy, test, learn, reward yourself!