Okay, first off normally when doing a system it would be a no-brainer for me, AMD. Recently though, pentiums with the revised core are performing rather nicely. I will build this system exactly on or around the week of Christmas as a present to myself
Basically I want raw performance. So it is between a P4 matched with rambus, or the not yet released Barton, which will have a better FSB, cache and I will match it with the nforce2. I'm thinking both will be close in price.. and maybe very close in performance. By the time I'm making this system barton will have been out for atleast 6 weeks, also will have been the nforce2. As well as P4's with HT, though I'm not worried about HT aince I see no reason for it yet. And I'm not counting on clawhammer for this system either. Most likely they will just be coming out, very high demand with low supply with equal high prices. Also the boards will just be coming out, way too expensive. I'll wait until March (my b-day) to make my new clawhammer system
Below is a list of what I will prolly want. I need your help with estimating what the unreleased products will be.. and of course input on components.
I currently have a AXP 1900+ with an AK31a and 256MB on PC2100, gf4 ti4200. I will be keeping the gf4 for now. This may change if the 9700's dive by xmas, as well as depending of what nvidia 30 looks like. Also I have a SB aud i'm keeping, and a case.
<b>THE ATHLON XTREME </b>
CPU: BARTON AXP 2800+ approx: $375 ?
COOLER: VOLCANO 7+ $25
BOARD: Something with NFORCE2, the non-intergrated graphics version approx: $150 ?
Hmm...well, don't forget, Intel is going to likely have a Northwood 3.06Ghz by the end of this year, or early Q1 next year. Also, it's quite possible it will have hyperthreading enabled, which will more or less yield a performance gain (i'm not even going to guess, might be flamed). There's also a good chance the Granitebay chipset will be on time, nice DC DDR 266 or 333 support. Actually, to be honest, your system now is more than enough for at least a year or so for games, I think it's almost a waste to upgrade so soon. Not worth getting a "present" if you don't need it.
Soon enough, Intel will make the i845s...imagine dual channel Sdram...*shudder*
I thought CRTs are way better for gaming than even modern LCDs. You know, response time, non-native resolutions, and all that...
Yes, but I don't care LOL! ) I really like LCD's and I could use the extra space and the overall better look of them over bulky CRTs. There are very decent LCD's out now. Eventually though, I'll want a plasma screen... but I'm not making that kind of cash yet!
Hmm...well, don't forget, Intel is going to likely have a Northwood 3.06Ghz by the end of this year, or early Q1 next year. Also, it's quite possible it will have hyperthreading enabled, which will more or less yield a performance gain (i'm not even going to guess, might be flamed). There's also a good chance the Granitebay chipset will be on time, nice DC DDR 266 or 333 support. Actually, to be honest, your system now is more than enough for at least a year or so for games, I think it's almost a waste to upgrade so soon. Not worth getting a "present" if you don't need it.
Granted in a few months this system will have aged a bit more, and undoubtely barton XP's and the fastest pentiums will bury it even further into the low end section. I want speed ) Also, I'm likely to add a graphics chip to the list, but I'm waiting to see if NV30 does blow the 9700 away, plus 25% and to see what prices are.
About hyperthreading; as I said in the first post, I don't see the point of HT yet. I'm sure someone can write a book sized post about how it could increase performance in certain apps, blah blah blah, but currently only in "certain apps," which I prolly don't even use.. and only a few percentiles of performance isn't worth the extra few hundred it will cost when it first comes out.
The raw system total should be around 1 grand (as listed above). I'm assuming the CPU I get will be around $375. This will either be a Barton XP, or a near top of the line P4. I'm waiting to see how the barton and nforce2 shape up. I'm betting they will kick total ass actually, but around x-mas who knows what intella might have out. As stated in my first post, clawhammers will be too high due to low supply and high demand, if even available around christmas. And who knows, intel's latest p4's, when paired with rambus, still might perform better than the athlon bartons. Another thing I'm figuring is the 2.8 or maybe even 2.93/3GHz chip (22x/22.5 mulitpliers if released) may cost around $375, which could be the same or e less than the latest AMD bartons with the nforce2 offering? It boils down to performance for me, because it seems AMD and Intel are closer than ever when figuring the price for a system.
LOL I'd love a stock 3GHz system! And to think it's less than a couple of months away and most people out there don't even have 1GHz+ systems. Yes, I know mhz isn't everything, but damn, <b>3GHz</b> ) And as for granite bay, it sounds like a clothing brand Target would offer.. lol. DETAILS? what is it, DC DDR for the p4 or amd.. and how is it supposed to perform??<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by nja469 on 09/03/02 08:58 PM.</EM></FONT></P>
I'm not saying any of the system parts you listed are bad, and certainly not a waste of money, but soon enough, the costs will be driven down, and it's almost better just to get the lower end parts to save some. Ok, do not quote me on this, but if I read back into it (there's an article at <A HREF="http://www.anandtech.com" target="_new">http://www.anandtech.com</A>, it showed the benefits). Now, if I remember correctly, it improved anywhere from negative 7 to positive 35 percent in applications. Once Intel works the kinks from it, we'll be seeing no negative results. I'll have to look into it.
Soon enough, Intel will make the i845s...imagine dual channel Sdram...*shudder*
Wow! Not quoting you, but even half of 35% would be a nice increase! I'm anxiously awaiting feedback on the granite bay chipset, I suppose? IS it codename for Intel 860 or something? Sorry for the ignorance on it, but until recently I've followed mostly AMD stuff. But with intel solutions coming to par with AMD solutions and offering more performance, I'd be stupid not to be interested!
You need the P4T533-C; the one you selected only runs 4200 RIMMs (i.e. one big fat rimm, not pairs).
And in my opinion, everything AMD has in the pipe looks really sexy, but I have yet to see any of it pan out. Your P4 system isn't too much more than the Athlon, and if you're all for raw performance, you gotta go with a P4 + 1066 RDRAM.
Maybe a lower-end AXP would save another $200 or so and make the AMD setup a bit more attractive. I guess you'll just have to wait until November or so to see how things have shaped up.
mate....honestly, I have a AthlonXP 1900+ plus GF4 Ti too.....there's no way I think I'll need to upgrade until this time next year....all games currently out and in final production will run fine on it, so save yourself some money, and hold back on an upgrade.
Our systems will render UT 2003 with FSAA at hi res....probably run Doom 3 really well too.....wait
hmm, i can't help you with this, but maybe you could recommend some parts for me. i was looking to build another comp around memorial day '04. any suggestions?
thanks.
Plasma even worst than lcd, the super low resolution (even lower than LCD) makes it the worst thing for using it as a monitor. Get a bigger desk and get a Pro 21" CRT monitor.
<font color=red>Got a silent setup, now I can hear myself thinking.... great silence</font color=red>
Newer LCD's with 25ms rates or less offer great overall gaming performance. While it doesn't look better than a CRT, most people, myself included think the performance of the LCD at these rates is exceptionally acceptable.
I hate huge CRT's.. it is my system and I want an LCD ) Everyone else can get CRTs if that's what they want!
Nice system (either way, but I'd still go with p4).. if you like to future proof your system, get a MB that supports the AGP8x radeon 9700 (that's what you're thinking about buying right?). the planned MB is AGP4x. Avoid ya the headache of buying it and having to come back and posting why it doesn't work.
<font color=green> there's more to life than increasing its speed -Ghandi</font color=green>
Doesn't matter for two reasons. You can manually set the AGP to 4x speed, and it would work. Also, as it stands, AGP 8x has relatively NO gain over AGP 4x.
Soon enough, Intel will make the i845s...imagine dual channel Sdram...*shudder*
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.