It would result in a DECREASE in performance, I tested a 933 against a Celeron 1.2GHz overclocked to 1480 and got similar performance. The Celeron Tualatin is still a Celeron, it has 1/4 less bandwidth than your 933 and a lot more cache latency (1 cycle as compared to 0 cycles). I see a lot of so called "hardware" site extolling the virtues of these worthless processors without any real benchmarks to back them up, except some esoteric benches like Prime 95 or something that is based soley on CPU cycles, something real programs like games don't do.
If you would like to experiment with the Tualatin Celleron, I suggest a 1GHz version, as you could likely overclock that to 1.4GHz at 140MHz FSB, as opposed to the stock sucky 100MHz FSB, and you'd probably get at least 25% better performance from a 1000@1400 than a 1400@stock simply because of the increased bus speed.
<font color=blue>You're posting in a forum with class. It may be third class, but it's still class!</font color=blue>