not that it matters, but my opinion bout celeron

[tbirdXPplus]

if it isn`t a tualatin celeron that can overclock to 133FSB, then it`s not worth buying.

the coppermine celeron....intels failure, a cheating processor. 128kb L2 cache is not enough, and the early versions used 66MHz FSB, making it crippled even more.

the Willt/cel...another crappy version, only 128KB of L2 cache.

and nor the northwood celeron, at 2GHz. who cares if u can OC this to 3GHz? can`t even follow the performance of a 1.8A p4. and i as expecting a 256KB cache on the northwood version celerons, intel just put 128KBs on it.

since A-XP`s prices are very inexpensive, i`d recommend an athlon instead of a celeron

"Is Celeron good?"
"No. Celeron is bad."
LOL

 

[tbirdXPplus]

what pisses me off is that most people think that the p4 celeron is the same as the real p4, and don`t think of it as a rip off.

"Is Celeron good?"
"No. Celeron is bad."
LOL

 

[spud]

I know this great doctor he can help you with you *ehem*... Other friend... you know the one you are always talking too...Well keep this hush hush can be quite embarassing.

-Jeremy

<font color=blue>Just some advice from your friendly neighborhood blue man </font color=blue>

 

[IntelConvert]

And <A HREF="http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/02q3/020903/index.html" target="_new"> here is THG's opinion</A>.