Hello Tom's world,
I'm a system builder in Australia and therefore find myself at Toms Hardware quite often, checking out all the latest reviews and Benchmark tests.
I'm starting to get a little annouyed at the P4 vs Athlon benchmark tests here at Tom's. They simply do not hold any real world relevance. No-one I'm selling PC's to are buying P4's with RDRAM. My high-end systems are always Athlons with DDR333 or P4's with DDR333. I think you'll find this is the trend the world over, so why aren't we seeing benchmarks comparing the CPU's in this configuration?
If you want to include P4 with PC-1066 in the benchmarks then fine, I don't care, but please PLEASE also show everyone how the P4 performs with DDR333(PC-2700).
From my experience with my own bechmark testing the Athlon is still a pretty comfortable leader in the CPU stakes when both platforms use DDR333. I think the world should be better informed about this.
I'm a system builder in Australia and therefore find myself at Toms Hardware quite often, checking out all the latest reviews and Benchmark tests.
I'm starting to get a little annouyed at the P4 vs Athlon benchmark tests here at Tom's. They simply do not hold any real world relevance. No-one I'm selling PC's to are buying P4's with RDRAM. My high-end systems are always Athlons with DDR333 or P4's with DDR333. I think you'll find this is the trend the world over, so why aren't we seeing benchmarks comparing the CPU's in this configuration?
If you want to include P4 with PC-1066 in the benchmarks then fine, I don't care, but please PLEASE also show everyone how the P4 performs with DDR333(PC-2700).
From my experience with my own bechmark testing the Athlon is still a pretty comfortable leader in the CPU stakes when both platforms use DDR333. I think the world should be better informed about this.