<A HREF="http://www.startribune.com/stories/789/3447981.html" target="_new">Here's</A> an article that was reprinted in my local paper (Minneapolis StarTribune) about Hyperthreading... it's originally from the Boston Globe. In general, it's pretty dismissive of HT, as well as the general need for computers to run anything more than a 1GHz machine with 256MB RAM. Seems kinda pro-AMD, but it still is for the lay-public. Interesting read. Goes to show that all the adverts in the world can't save you if the newspapers take a different angle... or the adverts are preaching to the choir *cough*AMD*cough*.
Best quotation:
-SammyBoy
Some day, THG-willing, I shall obtain the coveted "Old Hand" title.
Best quotation:
On the front page, there is (as of 1:30pm CST on Monday) an article on cheap computers that still have more power than anyone would need for awhile. Seems to me that the general public is pretty ho-hum about anything in the computer world.Only a fool underestimates the lust for computing power. Somebody, somewhere will find some use for hyperthreading. Still, Intel's newest gadget faces a formidable rival -- Intel itself. For years, the company cranked out billions of chips so powerful that people scarcely knew what to do with them. Alas for Intel, users now know exactly what to do with all those old Pentium machines: keep running them till they croak. It's not as cool as ordering a hot new hyperthreaded Pentium 4, but it'll do.
-SammyBoy
Some day, THG-willing, I shall obtain the coveted "Old Hand" title.