no because if you were "smart" you would know if you are so serious into overclocking A p4 rig is a better choice, even tho "I" like AMD, for their price performance/ratio... p4 is a better overclocker.
Yes, everybody knows that a P4 is most likely going to overclock well even with the stock cooler, although there's no guarantee. But maybe I was getting bored with all the reports on overclocking a P4, that I just had to try something else. This combined with the fact that THG's latest VGA charts update:
<A HREF="http://www6.tomshardware.com/graphic/20021218/index.html" target="_new">http://www6.tomshardware.com/graphic/20021218/index.html</A>
actually showed a P4 3.06GHz HT / ASUS P4PE combo being beat up by a XP2700+ / ASUS A7N8X combo. Yes, read it again, even the mighty 3.06GHz P4 with HyperThreading is being beat up by a XP2700+ when used together with the most common DDR SDRAM P4 chipset at the moment, the 845PE.
Also I had a potent watercooling kit lying around, and I felt that the small Thoroughbred B core would probably benefit the most of watercooling. Well, with my XP2400+ now running at something close to XP3000+ specs, I'm sure it's able to beat a P4 3.06GHz HT in at least Aquanox, Dungeon Siege, UT2K3, Jedi Knight II, 3DMark2001 SE and probably a lot more benchmarks. I don't think I could have obtained significantly more performance had I chosen to go the P4 route. Luck also plays an important part in this; how well will a given CPU overclock; you never know.
<i>/Copenhagen - Clockspeed will make the difference... in the end</i>