US military loses contact with hypersonic aircraft
Tags:
Last response: in News & Leisure
US military scientists lost contact with an unmanned hypersonic experimental aircraft on its second test flight, officials said.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-14497641
The first flight wasn't a success either, so I guess considering the current economic conditions, they may not get a 3rd chance any time soon.
More about : military loses contact hypersonic aircraft
Related ressources
- [d20 Modern] Ideas about a military style campaign - Forum
- Military Laptop? - Forum
- The Fate of Naval Combat - Forum
- US laughs as the Koran is flushed down the toilet - Forum
- US Budget - Forum
Archean said:
Who knows? But I don't think nations with 'satellites' won't know about it coming their way, so it will only terrorize weaker nations, who doesn't stand any chance against the US military even today.Dont forget its a stealth craft also. I don't believe that Sats are going to track this thing if it didn't want to be tracked. If / When this aircraft get working it will have changed warfare. The ability to move something, anything at mach 20 would remove the whole traveling to the battlefield. You could drop off Seal Team 6 in Kuwait faster than most people commute to work.
I agree on the SAM argument guys, but I think this thing can be track-able, even if its completely stealth, how do you hide the heated air frame, all they need something which can track in infra-red or something like that.
But anyway, I am sure by the time they have it ready, others will start thinking about something similar.
But anyway, I am sure by the time they have it ready, others will start thinking about something similar.
80.000 feet sounds about right but the exact figure is of course a secret. If I'm not mistaken there exist SAMs that can reach this altitude, so the craft can be destroyed through a head-on collision with a SAM, since its heat signature can indeed be tracked.
A scenario is conceivable where another country lures the US into a trap (launching the craft to attack a fake target) to make a serious dent in the US federal budget. Oops, probably shouldn't have said that...
Well, at least the scramjet research is interesting for use in future aircraft.
A scenario is conceivable where another country lures the US into a trap (launching the craft to attack a fake target) to make a serious dent in the US federal budget. Oops, probably shouldn't have said that...
Well, at least the scramjet research is interesting for use in future aircraft.
Naaa ... it crapped out after takeoff.
It needs a decent tail fin ... just look at the thing.
What idiot designed it?
Its too unstable ... rolls to easily.
It probably rolled too much ... they overcompensated ... it ripped apart in the air.
Not enough testing at lower speeds ... the computer probably couldn't control it.
It needs a decent tail fin ... just look at the thing.
What idiot designed it?
Its too unstable ... rolls to easily.
It probably rolled too much ... they overcompensated ... it ripped apart in the air.
Not enough testing at lower speeds ... the computer probably couldn't control it.
Gulli said:
80.000 feet sounds about right but the exact figure is of course a secret. If I'm not mistaken there exist SAMs that can reach this altitude, so the craft can be destroyed through a head-on collision with a SAM, since its heat signature can indeed be tracked.A scenario is conceivable where another country lures the US into a trap (launching the craft to attack a fake target) to make a serious dent in the US federal budget. Oops, probably shouldn't have said that...
Well, at least the scramjet research is interesting for use in future aircraft.
The fastest SAMs travel mach 6-7. If this thing really does mach 20, then it can simply walk away from anything launched at it.
Well technically no ... if the attack vector is good then it can be taken out.
It probably would not have great maneouverability at Mach 20 either.
Put a missile on a front on attack vector ... there are a few that would be useful even the older ones.
http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-Rus-BVR-AAM.html
It probably would not have great maneouverability at Mach 20 either.
Put a missile on a front on attack vector ... there are a few that would be useful even the older ones.
http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-Rus-BVR-AAM.html
Oldmangamer_73 said:
If this tactic didn't work for the SR-71 at mach 4, it's not going to work with this thing traveling at mach 20.The SR-71 is harder to detect and more maneuverable. Also, SAM technology and tracking methods have improved since the cold war. The thing is whoever wants to stop it needs prior warning, so a small country won't see it coming, unless neighbouring allies warn them.
Oldmangamer_73 said:
Mystic is right on this one. I don't think a surface to air weapon exists that would be able to knock this thing out of the sky.Don't worry in a few years, The Russian military will come up with something in genius as usual, then sell it to the middle east who will then use it against us. It is how it has been for many years now sadly.
Archean said:
US military scientists lost contact with an unmanned hypersonic experimental aircraft on its second test flight, officials said.http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-14497641
The first flight wasn't a success either, so I guess considering the current economic conditions, they may not get a 3rd chance any time soon.
I'd be willing to spend a trillion dollars on this, then spend a million dollars to provide entitlements.
Gulli said:
The SR-71 is harder to detect and more maneuverable. Also, SAM technology and tracking methods have improved since the cold war. The thing is whoever wants to stop it needs prior warning, so a small country won't see it coming, unless neighbouring allies warn them.Maybe the SR-71 is harder to detect, but even if this new aircraft is easier to detect...there is virtually nothing you can do to stop it. Intercepting an aircraft that travels 13,000mph or around 4miles per second is impossible...
Not to mention that the SR-71 is highly outdated where there are far superior aircraft like the FA-22 Raptor and something new thats coming out soon, I forget its name right now.
blackhawk1928 said:
Don't worry in a few years, The Russian military will come up with something in genius as usual, then sell it to the middle east who will then use it against us. It is how it has been for many years now sadly. I'd be willing to spend a trillion dollars on this, then spend a million dollars to provide entitlements.
So whenever you lose one you've lost a trillion dollars... that way you only have to lose 14 to destroy the entire economy...
There is no operational land based weapon known to man that can touch these things aside from a very powerful land based laser. They have a operational ceiling much higher that 80,000 ft. They are designed to skip off the Earth's upper atmosphere or what's known as the Karman Line which is 62 miles (100km) above the Earth. 80,000 ft. is just 15 miles. Maybe a Kinetic weapon but certainly nothing rocket propelled.
tinmann said:
There is no operational land based weapon known to man that can touch these things aside from a very powerful land based laser. They have a operational ceiling much higher that 80,000 ft. They are designed to skip off the Earth's upper atmosphere or what's known as the Karman Line which is 62 miles (100km) above the Earth. 80,000 ft. is just 15 miles. Maybe a Kinetic weapon but certainly nothing rocket propelled.100km is too high for scramjets I would think (too few oxygen molecules), but I'm not an expert.
I have an idea of how to stop this aircraft for relatively nothing.
If(IF is the main word here) you can track it you know where its going to be in 20 mins. Deploy a few rockets that scatter some debris in its path (There must be something that will sit in the upper atmosphere for a while). Could you imagine a vehicle doing mach 20 running into anything even as large as a grain of sand? I also don't imagine that it will be able to maneuver too well moving that fast.
If(IF is the main word here) you can track it you know where its going to be in 20 mins. Deploy a few rockets that scatter some debris in its path (There must be something that will sit in the upper atmosphere for a while). Could you imagine a vehicle doing mach 20 running into anything even as large as a grain of sand? I also don't imagine that it will be able to maneuver too well moving that fast.
My theory is is that it will indeed reach the Karman Line and then start to glide down until there is enough oxygen for its scramjet to start working, then it will continue to its target and drop a single guided missile, at this point its altitude will be much less than 100km, more like 25-30km and it can be hit by the most advanced SAMs (the missile can be intercepted as well).
You guys wanna see something do mach 20?
Darpa just released a vid of the HTV-2 in action. Video isnt great so I hope some of you have very large monitors.
Darpa just released a vid of the HTV-2 in action. Video isnt great so I hope some of you have very large monitors.
Related ressources:
- ForumFrance, Britain, and US Light Up Libya
- ForumFlorida Getting Ready for Military Draft
- ForumUS invades Australia ... with free pseudomedical advice
- ForumThank you president
- ForumHow to fix the US National Debt
- ForumArmed Assault - US Version Comming!
- ForumEbay Can't Spell.............
- ForumAmish Teen on in low speed chase with police
- ForumOh yes, France loses again!!!!!!!
- ForumU.S. Is Deferring Millions in Pakistani Military Aid
- ForumBrady Bunch mom got crabs in affair with DEM presidential nominee
- ForumHaving major issues with Facebook, dont know where to turn
- ForumDocuments Show FCC Coordinated 'Net Neutrality' Effort With Leftists
- ForumSocialists Explain How They Worked With Muslim Brotherhood & .....
- ForumWould You Steal Gas If You Could Get Away With It?
- More resources
Read discussions in other News & Leisure categories
!